PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Expanding the Reach of SAD
April 2015
Greasing the Path for SFX
January 2015
Time-Resolved Crystallography with HATRX
December 2014
Structures Without Damage
August 2014
Error Prevention
July 2014
A Refined Refinement Strategy
May 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Optimizing Damage
February 2014
Getting Better at Low Resolution
January 2014
Building a Structural Library
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Identifying Dynamic Networks by CONTACT
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
Fluorescence- and Chromatography-Based Protein Thermostability Assay
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Native phasing
August 2012
Smaller may be better
April 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Not so cool
December 2011
One from many
August 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Beyond crystals, solutions, and powders
May 2011
Snapshot crystallography
March 2011
FERM-ly bound
February 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
'Super-resolution' large complexes
December 2010
Proteinase K and Digalacturonic Acid
September 2010
Some crystals like it hot
May 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Tackling the phase problem
November 2009
Crystallizing glycoproteins
September 2009
Crystals from recalcitrant proteins
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
Chaperone-assisted crystallography
March 2009
An “X-ray” ruler
January 2009
Methylation boosts protein crystallization
December 2008

Technology Topics Crystallography

Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/th_psisgkb.2009.25]
Technical Highlight - June 2009
Short description: A practical guide to cloning, expressing, purifying and crystallizing membrane proteins.Nat. Protoc. 4, 619-637 (2009)

Detailed methods for obtaining pure, soluble membrane protein samples and diffraction-quality crystals are usually published with the solved structure and are often too specific to be generally useful. A general protocol for growth of membrane protein crystals has recently been published in Nature Protocols by Newby et al. 1 in collaboration with the PSI. Here, their method is distilled into ten handy hits for successful membrane protein crystallization.

Tip 1 The best predictors of crystallization success are purity and stability. As a rule of thumb, start with a protein sample that is more than 98% pure, more than 95% homogeneous and more than 95% stable when stored unconcentrated at 4 °C for 1 week.

Tip 2 Add a cleavable amino- or carboxy-terminal tag. N-terminal fusion proteins seem to increase the amount of proteins expressed, and tags in general make purification much simpler. Useful vectors for expression are the pET vectors, which are driven by T7 RNA polymerase and are inducible by isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). An alternative is the pBAD vector system, which uses arabinose for induction. Tags to consider are poly-histidine, maltose-binding protein, glutathione-S-transferase, the PelB leader sequence and the membrane-integrating sequence for translation of integral membrane constructs (Mistic).

Tip 3 Try a variety of temperatures and media for cell growth. A reduction in the growth temperature can make the difference between an improperly folded aggregate in inclusion bodies and one that is correctly folded and inserted into the membrane.

Tip 4 Although not strictly necessary, isolating the membrane faction from Escherichia coli by centrifugation immediately after harvesting and lysing the cells can reduce proteolysis by removing unwanted proteins from the insoluble fraction.

Tip 5 The concentration of detergent used for solubilization will depend in part on its critical micellar concentration (CMC), the concentration at which detergent monomers self-associate into micelles. Concentrations much higher than the CMC are usually used for solubilization to insure that there is sufficient detergent to saturate and disrupt the lipid bilayer and allow the target protein to be extracted from the membrane.

Tip 6 Different detergents can be used for purification and crystallization, and these can be easily exchanged while the sample is immobilized on an ion-exchange column. A longer-chain detergent is often used to extract the protein from the lipid membrane and a shorter-chain one for crystallization.

Tip 7 If the affinity tag proves hard to remove, this might be either because the detergent micelle is preventing the protease from accessing the cleavage site or because the detergent is inhibiting the activity of the protease. Try placing the tag at the other terminus to allow the protease access or try adding five to ten times the normal amount of the recommended protease.

Workflow for generating membrane protein crystals.

Tip 8 Dialysis is not essential for membrane protein crystallization, but it is a useful step to insure that a minimal amount of detergent is used. Detergents dialyze to equilibrium at different rates depending on their CMC, so remember to allow sufficient time for full dialysis.

Tip 9 Reduce phase separation (the tendency for detergent to separate from the aqueous solution) as much as possible, as it can inhibit crystal formation and make results hard to reproduce. One way to do this is to reduce the amount of detergent present by using a concentrator with the largest molecular weight cut-off that will still retain the protein.

Tip 10 Start your crystallization screening with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or commercial screens based on PEG as it is overwhelmingly the most successful precipitating agent for membrane proteins.

Related articles

Predicting crystallization success

A pocket guide to GPCRs

Evolving a better-expressing GPCR

Tuning membrane protein overexpression

Maria Hodges

References

  1. Z. E. R. Newby et al. A general protocol for the crystallization of membrane proteins for X-ray structural investigation.
    Nat. Protoc. 4, 619-637 (2009). doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.27

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health