PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Molecular Portraits of the Cell
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Updating ModBase
January 2015
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Cancer Networks: Predicting Catalytic Residues from 3D Protein Structures
November 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Infectious Diseases: Targeting Meningitis
May 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Refining protein structure prediction
March 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Devil is in the details
January 2012
Playing while you work
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Fit to serve
October 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Structure from sequence
July 2011
An easier solution for symmetry
June 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Modeling RNA structures
May 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Network coverage
November 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Protein modeling made easy
July 2009
Model proteins in your lunch break
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008
Modeling with SAXS
October 2008
Designing activity
September 2008

Technology Topics Modeling

Protein modeling made easy

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/th_psisgkb.2009.31]
Technical Highlight - July 2009
Short description: Working on a protein with no known structure? Try the Phyre server for simple-to-interpret protein models.Nature Protoc. 4, 363-371 (2009)

Example of predicted functional sites colored by prediction confidence.

A protein structure can often reveal the details and mechanism of its function. Just over 50,000 protein structures have been experimentally determined but with over six million unique proteins sequences deposited in various databases there could be quite a wait before your protein is solved.

In the meantime, what can you do? Firstly, you can nominate your protein to be solved by the PSI. Secondly, you can generate a model of your protein based on its predicted structure. This should reveal surface residues and conserved amino acids that are likely to form the active site or binding pocket.

Numerous protein structure prediction programs exist, but one of the easiest to use is the Phyre server 1 . The predictive power of this server is similar to other publicly available software, and the most recent Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) competition judged the latest Phyre version to be one of the best servers for preliminary assessment of protein structures.

Getting started is simple: go to the Phyre home page (www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre/), paste in your amino-acid sequence, add your email address and click the button. Wait half an hour, and you will receive an email with a link to a web page with the results, which include downloadable three-dimensional models of the protein and an estimate of how much confidence can be placed in these predictions. The coordinates of the model are in PDB format, so they can be viewed by standard molecular viewers such as Pymol, Rasmol and others.

The models generated rely on homology modelling, which is the most accurate way to predict protein structure. An estimated precision is given for each structure and the confidence values are color-coded from red (high confidence) to blue (low confidence). If several choices are presented, choose the one with several high-confidence predictions.

Now that you have a reasonably accurate model, how do you predict the residues that are most likely to be involved in the function of the protein? Click on the 'Model pockets/cavities/clefs' button and those residues found within the five largest pockets will be labeled. More information can be found in Nature Protocols.

So what are your options if Phyre or other databases can't find a good homology match for your protein? You could try an ab initio structure prediction approach such as Robetta. Alternatively try Phyre again in a few weeks' time. With 50 new structures solved each week, a reliable homolog may well be there next time you check.

Maria Hodges

References

  1. L. A. Kelley & M. J. E. Sternberg Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server.
    Nature. Protoc. 4, 363-371 (2009). doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.2

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health