PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
The Immune System: A Strong Competitor
June 2013
The Immune System: Strand Swapping for T-Cell Inhibition
June 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Morph to Assemble
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Reading Between the Lines
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: When the Sum Is Greater than the Parts
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Reading out regioselectivity
December 2011
An effective and cooperative dimer
November 2011
PDZ domains: sometimes it takes two
November 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
A growing family
February 2011
FERM-ly bound
February 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Spot protein-protein interactions… fast
March 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Two-component signaling
December 2009
ABA receptor...this time for real?
November 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Vav1 and Rho GTPase Rac1
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008

Research Themes Protein-protein interactions

Get3 into the groove

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/fa_psisgkb.2009.44]
Featured Article - October 2009
Short description: Unlike most membrane proteins, SNAREs enter the endoplasmic reticulum after translation. The structure of the ATPase needed for entry reveals the likely mechanism.

Crystal structures of Get3 in open (a) and closed (b) dimer states. Each monomer comprises a core ATPase subdomain (blue, green) and an α-helical subdomain (magenta, yellow). A tightly bound zinc atom (brown sphere) lies at the dimer interface. PDB 2WOO, 2WOJ

In eukaryotic cells, membrane proteins are sent to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) during or shortly after synthesis. Most membrane proteins possess a signal recognition peptide that ensures that the new protein is co-translationally targeted to the ER. However, a small but very important group that includes the SNARE proteins needed for vesicle trafficking and the Bcl2 family members needed for apoptosis use a post-translational pathway.

This group, called the tail-anchored proteins, has a single C-terminal transmembrane domain (TMD) that holds the targeting information. In yeast, this domain interacts with a highly conserved ATPase called Get3 (Asna1 or TRC40 in mammals) to form a complex that is then targeted to the ER. Mateja et al. have now solved the X-ray crystal structure of Get3 in both nucleotide-free and nucleotide-bound conformations, revealing the likely mechanism for Get3 binding.

Both structures are symmetrical homodimers comprising ATPase and α-helical subdomains. In the nucleotide-free or 'open' state the α-helical subdomains have a space between them of at least 20 Å. The charged surface of this gap suggests that it may have a function other than binding substrates' TMDs. The nucleotide-bound state, however, undergoes a conformational change that brings the α-helical domains together, creating a solvent-exposed hydrophobic groove that spans both monomers.

Extensive mutagenesis of the residues within this groove showed that these hydrophobic amino acids are needed for substrate binding. In addition, the structure indicated that the nucleotide-binding sites are located near the ATPase switch II region, linking nucleotide binding to formation of the TMD-binding site.

Maria Hodges

References

  1. A. Mateja et al. The structural basis of tail-anchored membrane protein recognition by Get3.
    Nature (2009). doi:10.1038/nature08319

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health