PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Channels and Transporters: BEST in Show
April 2015
Channels and Transporters: Reorienting a Peptide in the Pocket
April 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Refolding in Membrane Mimetic
March 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: A Cap on Transport
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Pumping Out Heavy Metal
April 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: A Funnel-like Viroporin
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Unveiling the Human α-helical Membrane Proteome
August 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Nanoparticles in Cell Camouflage
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Tuning Membrane Protein Expression
December 2012
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Building a Carrier
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Overexpressed problems
February 2012
Gentle membrane protein extraction
January 2012
Docking and rolling
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
Sugar transport
June 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
TrkH Potassium Ion Transporter
April 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Formate transporter or channel?
March 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins
January 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Surviving in an acid environment
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
You look familiar: the Type VI secretion system
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
Death clusters
March 2009
Protein nanopores
March 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
A pocket guide to GPCRs
December 2008
Tuning membrane protein overexpression
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Membrane proteins

Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/fa_psisgkb.2009.58]
Featured Article - January 2010
Short description: A modest reshaping of the lipid bilayer allows water molecules to hydrate voltage-gating channels and focus the electrical field.

Effects of the voltage-sensing domain on a lipid bilayer as revealed by molecular dynamic simulation.

Atomic-resolution structures cannot tell the whole story of a membrane protein's activity. To really understand a channel's function, it has to be studied within its native setting — the lipid bilayer. A technical tour de force by Kenton Swartz, Steve White and colleagues reveals how voltage-sensing proteins subtly reshape the surrounding lipid bilayer.

Voltage-gated channels, such as potassium, sodium and calcium channels, open and close in response to a change in membrane voltage. Membrane-embedded helices S1–S4 sense electrical potential through charged amino-acid residues within helix S4. But how is the lipid bilayer — essentially a hydrophobic environment — able to accommodate this positive charge?

Until recently, the only way to answer this question was to use computational approaches. Molecular simulations suggested that the positive charges in helix S4 reorganize the surrounding membrane, but the effect of the whole sensor domain, S1–S4, was less clear and all these studies lacked experimental validation.

Membrane thinning

Swartz, White and colleagues examined the voltage-sensing domain of KvAP, a channel from the archeon Aeropyrum pernix. They prepared a homogeneous sample of this domain embedded in the lipid membrane and studied it using neutron diffraction, a technique that records average perturbations over the entire membrane plane.

Their data indicated that the bilayer remains largely intact around the S1–S4 module, although there is a thinning of the membrane directly around the protein of about 3 Å. It is possible that in certain locations, particularly in the area immediately surrounding the protein domains, the membrane is thinner than the average measured using neutron diffraction.

Water arrangement

Crevices in the potassium channel sensing domain, revealed during previous crystallographic experiments, have been suggested to reshape the electric field. To do this, they would need to be filled with water when the protein is embedded in the membrane, but until now, their hydration had not been measured.

To measure the hydration in the KvAP sensing domain, the team again used neutron diffraction; this time comparing the scattering from water and that from lipids with four deuterium atoms in the head-group region. As deuterated nuclei produce a positive scattering length, and hydrogen a negative one, deuterium can be easily detected. They found an extensive overlap of water and protein, suggesting that S1–S4 is hydrated.

Neutron diffraction can detect the overall distribution of water and protein in the bilayer but it cannot indicate whether water directly associates with the voltage sensors. So the authors used solid-state NMR spectroscopy to measure magnetization transfer from water to lipid by looking at 1H dipole–dipole interactions.

Their experiments indicated that water is closely associated with the protein within the bilayer and, taken together, these results suggest that the crevice in the sensing domain contains water when embedded in the membrane. When filled with water, this crevice would focus the electric field and would ensure that the charged residues remain charged and are able to move in response to membrane voltage.

The voltage sensor has probably evolved to interact with lipid molecules while keeping energetic and structural perturbations to the minimum. This set-up is likely to be relevant to other membrane proteins too. For example, G-protein-coupled receptors have binding sites for water-soluble ligands and perhaps these are hydrated in the membrane as well.

Related articles

Get3 into the groove

GPCR subunits: separate but not equal

Escherichia coli O157:H7 amino acid antiporter structure

Maria Hodges

References

  1. D. Krepkiy, M. Mihailescu, J. A. Freites, E. V. Schow, D. L. Worcester et al. Structure and hydration of membranes embedded with voltage-sensing domains.
    Nature 426, 473-479 (2009). doi:10.1038/nature08542

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health