PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Channels and Transporters: BEST in Show
April 2015
Channels and Transporters: Reorienting a Peptide in the Pocket
April 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Refolding in Membrane Mimetic
March 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: A Cap on Transport
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Pumping Out Heavy Metal
April 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: A Funnel-like Viroporin
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Unveiling the Human α-helical Membrane Proteome
August 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Nanoparticles in Cell Camouflage
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Tuning Membrane Protein Expression
December 2012
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Building a Carrier
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Overexpressed problems
February 2012
Gentle membrane protein extraction
January 2012
Docking and rolling
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
Sugar transport
June 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
TrkH Potassium Ion Transporter
April 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Formate transporter or channel?
March 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins
January 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Surviving in an acid environment
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
You look familiar: the Type VI secretion system
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
Death clusters
March 2009
Protein nanopores
March 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
A pocket guide to GPCRs
December 2008
Tuning membrane protein overexpression
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Membrane proteins

Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/th_psisgkb.2009.60]
Technical Highlight - January 2010
Short description: A refinement of the SPP method eliminates lengthy purification steps in the pursuit of membrane proteins suitable for structural studies.

Protein expression using the SPP system.

Purifying membrane proteins for structural studies is usually a time-consuming and costly task. Now Masayori Inouye and colleagues from PSI NESG and NYCOMPS have adjusted their single protein production (SPP) technique to work with integral membrane proteins. Here are five reasons to use their method.

1. No purification required

Thanks to the highly enriched expression of the desired protein, a purification step is no longer needed, although a one-step purification on an affinity chromatography column improves the quality of the NMR spectra by eliminating unwanted phospholipids.

The condensed SPP (cSPP) system relies on producing the desired protein in bacteria expressing MazF, an mRNA interferase that removes all mRNAs containing the sequence. For example, the team substituted all the ACA sequences in the gene encoding the inner membrane protein YaiZ. They then induced expression of the modified YaiZ and MazF in Escherichia coli, separated the inner and outer membrane fractions, and found that YaiZ was the most abundant protein in the inner membrane. YaiZ was the only protein that was labeled with isotopes so that NMR studies on this membrane protein can be done without purification.

2. Saves money

Cells predominantly expressing YaiZ were resuspended in a much smaller volume of minimal medium for isotope labeling with 15NH4Cl than is normally used. Reducing the amount of suspension medium hugely reduces the cost of isotope labeling, with savings of up to 99%.

3. Easy protein deuteration

In this system, 2H2O does not inhibit protein production, unlike its effects in many other protein expression set-ups, and so it is possible to produce high-quality deuterium-enriched samples of soluble or membrane proteins. For small, soluble proteins, this enables reliable automated resonance assignments and the generation of three-dimensional structures.

4. Ideal for solid-state NMR

Solid-state NMR is one of the few non-invasive methods that can be used for membrane protein studies. The protein-enriched membrane fraction produced by cSPP is ideal for solid-state NMR studies.

5. Easy detergent screening

This cSPP system with its selective isotope enrichment of the target protein provides a straightforward way to screen for detergent buffer conditions without having to go through the whole purification process. The team performed high-throughput screening using a microcoil NMR probe to produce 1D NMR spectra.

The cSPP system shows that it is possible to obtain NMR data for membrane proteins without purification other than a simple membrane extraction. This method is quite general and is likely to be applicable to many other NMR-based studies.

Related articles

One system to express them all

The future of NMR

Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins

Maria Hodges

References

  1. L. Mao, Y. Tang, S. T. Vaiphei, T. Shimazu, S.-G. Kim et al. Production of membrane proteins for NMR studies using the condensed single protein (cSPP) production system.
    J. Struct. Funct. Genomics (2009). doi:10.1007/s10969-009-9072-0

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health