PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons

Related Articles
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Molecular Portraits of the Cell
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Updating ModBase
January 2015
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Cancer Networks: Predicting Catalytic Residues from 3D Protein Structures
November 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Infectious Diseases: Targeting Meningitis
May 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Refining protein structure prediction
March 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Devil is in the details
January 2012
Playing while you work
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Fit to serve
October 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Structure from sequence
July 2011
An easier solution for symmetry
June 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Modeling RNA structures
May 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Network coverage
November 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Protein modeling made easy
July 2009
Model proteins in your lunch break
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008
Modeling with SAXS
October 2008
Designing activity
September 2008

Technology Topics Modeling

Deducing function from small structural clues

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/th_psisgkb.2010.03]
Technical Highlight - February 2010
Short description: Find structural similarities without relying on fold classification by using the MarkUs server.

Click to view an enlarged version of the image

Making reasonable guesses about a protein's function from its structure is often, but not always, straightforward when two proteins are very similar, but what if two proteins are similar in just a small area? The MarkUs server provides a way to exploit sequence and structural relationships, whether close or remote.

Traditional structural classification of proteins on the basis of the composition and orientation of their secondary structural elements has worked well for identifying proteins with similar properties. The popular databases SCOP and CATH use these criteria to organize proteins into discreet classes or folds, meaning that one protein domain cannot be classified under two different folds.

But geometric similarities between particular regions of proteins that have different global topologies are increasingly being recorded, suggesting that remote relationships can indicate a functional link.

Barry Honig and colleagues from PSI NESG set out to discover whether structural fragments containing as few as three secondary structural elements can be used to uncover a common function. This idea has been discussed before, but this is the first time it has been used to suggest a function and the first time software based on this approach has been available.

The software they developed, the MarkUs server, integrates several sequence- and structure-based analysis methods, such as DALI, Psi-BLAST and DelPhi, to characterize the biochemical and biophysical properties of a protein structure and to suggest structural neighbors. In particular, DelPhi is important because it calculates electrostatic potential, which is useful for inferring membrane and DNA-binding regions or the enzymatic activity. The ability to search for structural relationships without relying on classification significantly increases the number of functional predictions that can be made. MarkUs then allows the analysis of these predictions using various annotation databases such as GO, UniProt, LS-SNP and ChEBI.

Such 'new generation' integrated computational and data-retrieval tools should allow a researcher to explore sequence, structural and functional databases in such a way as to develop and validate hypthotheses.

Related article

How does Dali work?

Maria Hodges


  1. D. Petrey, M. Fischer & B. Honig Structural relationships among proteins with different topologies and their implications for function annotation strategies.
    Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17377-17382 (2009). doi:10.1073/pnas.0907971106

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health