PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Pseudouridine Synthase TruA

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.3942/psi_sgkb/fm_2009_11]
Featured System - November 2009
Short description: Evolution is a great tinkerer.

Evolution is a great tinkerer. Over the course of millions of years, cells have honed and refined their machinery, selecting many refinements on the basic processes. We can see a perfect example of this by looking at transfer RNA. They are built by ribosomes in the traditional way, using the four standard types of nucleotides. But then a host of enzymes modify the nucleotides to form many different exotic structures. The most common modification is an isomerization: a uracil base is removed, flipped around, and reattached through one of its carbon atoms, changing uridine to pseudouridine.

Flipped Bases

The change from uridine to pseudouridine is subtle and has a subtle structural effect. The new C-C bond connecting the base to the sugar is more flexible than the typical C-N bond found in canonical nucleotides, however, the pseudouridine ironically makes the RNA strand a bit more rigid. The enhanced rigidity is caused by the new placement of the nitrogen atom. In normal bases the nitrogen atom is used to connect to the sugar, but in pseudouridine it is available to hydrogen bond to water. This water then can form hydrogen bonds with the nearby phosphate atoms, rigidifying the backbone and ultimately enhancing the stacking of bases. This is thought to be the major benefit of pseudouridine: it adds a little extra rigidity to regions of the RNA that need to have a defined structure.

Switch to Pseudouridine

Researchers at CSMP have revealed how Escherichia coli cells modify uridine nucleotides in the anticodon stem loop of transfer RNA. TruA is a pseudouridine synthase that specializes in three positions in the tRNA, positions 38, 39, and 40. These positions are in the critical base-paired region adjacent to the anticodon. The enzyme is a dimer of two identical subunits, which embraces both the 38-40 region of the tRNA and regions farther up the molecule. The enzyme acts on 17 different tRNA molecules in the bacteria cell. It appears to prefer tRNA molecules that are flexible, passing up ones that already have rigid anticodon stem loops. In this way, the enzyme helps the cell fine tune its tRNA, making them rigid but not too rigid for optimal function.

Flexible Embrace and a Flipped Out Base

The crystal structures show the structural basis for TruA's affinity for flexible tRNA molecules. Three different crystals of the enzyme in complex with two different forms of the leucine tRNA where obtained. Comparing the different structures, the tRNA shows a large range of motion. In several structures, the loop is bent outwards away from the enzyme. These structures highlight the importance of a key arginine amino acid for finding the base and pulling it into the active site. Several of the structures showed a conformation that is later in the process of acting on the base, with the loop folding deeper into the active site. In one of these structures, shown here from PDB entry 2nr0, a base is flipped out of the normal base pair and inserted into the active site. In this case it is guanine 39, so the structure is an abortive complex, since the enzyme does not make any changes to guanine bases. But it gives an idea of what might happen when the enzyme shifts to place a uridine in the active site. A conserved aspartate is there, ready to extract and flip the base. To take a closer look at this interaction, click in image below for an interactive Jmol view.

The JSmol tab below displays an interactive JSmol.

Hemolysin BL (PDB entry 2nrj)

The B component of hemolysin BL is shown here with a ribbon diagram. The large alpha helical bundle is shown in magenta and the small beta hairpin, which is thought to be the portion that penetrates into the cell membrane, is colored yellow.

References

  1. Hur, S. and Stroud, R. M. (2007) How U38, 39, and 40 of many tRNAs become the targets for pseudouridylation by TruA. Mol. Cell 26, 189-203.

  2. Hur, S., Stroud, R. M. and Finer-Moore, J. (2006) Substrate recognition by RNA 5-methyluridine methyltransferases and pseudouridine synthases: a structural perspective. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 38969-38973.

  3. Hamma, T. and Ferre-D'Amare (2006) Pseudouridine synthases. Chem. Biol. 13, 1125-1135.

  4. Charette, M. and Gray, M. W. (2000) Pseudouridine in RNA: what, where, how, and why. IUBMB Life 49, 341-351.

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health