PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Automating NMR Structures
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: A TRiC-ster that Follows the Rules
March 2015
Virology: Making Sensitive Magic
March 2014
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Inhibition Through Allostery
July 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Automatic NMR
September 2012
NMR structure test
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
S is for solubility
June 2012
Blind faith
April 2012
Follow the RNA leader
December 2011
Making invisible proteins visible
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Molecular replacement by magnetic resonance
August 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
No more labeled lipids
May 2011
Capsid assembly in motion
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Solving homodimeric structures with NMR
November 2010
CASD-NMR: assessing automated structure determination by NMR
June 2010
Peptidoglycan binding: Calcium-free killing
June 2010
Removing the NMR bottleneck
April 2010
NMR has its wiki way
March 2010
Extremely salty
February 2010
The future of NMR
September 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
Faster solid-state NMR
May 2009
Powerful NMR
April 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008

CASD-NMR: assessing automated structure determination by NMR

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/th_psisgkb.2010.25]
Technical Highlight - June 2010
Short description: Are we close to automated structures being as good as expert-deduced NMR structures?

Caption: Performance of various automated structure calculation methods. The results of fully automated calculations by various programs for one of the masked test data sets of the 2009 Florence workshop compared to the reference structure (bottom right) determined by Aramini, J.M. et al., PSI NESG Consortium (PDB 2KIF).

Assignment of protein NMR resonances, especially those of side-chains, can be difficult and time-consuming. After completing this task, thousands of individual NOESY peaks must still be analyzed to obtain inter-atomic distance information. Software that performs this last stage should speed up structure determination considerably, and might ultimately reduce errors and increase reproducibility.But how close are we to the point at which completely automated structures can be deposited into the Protein Data Bank (PDB) without first having been checked manually? e-NMR (an EC-funded initiative), using data from the PSI NESG, launched a challenge — a sort of competition — in which groups could to test their the automated methods, and the results are encouraging.

CASD-NMR (critical assessment of automated structure determination of proteins) is a challenge open to the whole protein NMR community that allows researchers to blind test the structures derived by their automated methods against manually refined ones. The idea is similar to other critical assessment exercises such as CASP (critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction) or GPCR Dock (G-protein-coupled receptor), although CASD-NMR is based on experimental data rather than predictions.

CASD-NMR was launched last year when seven groups took up the challenge. Ten experimental data sets that included two from PSI NESG were made available, and all the teams who submitted an entry got together in Florence, Italy in May 2009 to compare the structures produced by their automated methods. Most of the structures had the correct fold, but some programs could not establish the correct packing and length of secondary structures. Root-mean-squared deviations between the automatically generated backbone and with the manual ones were generally 1–2 Å, but some were as great as 9 Å.

Now, CASD-NMR has evolved into a community-wide project. Any software developer or member of any laboratory can take part and anyone can propose their NMR data as a test case. In addition, PSI NESG will provide at least one data set per month on the CASD-NMR website or within the datasets section of the Structural Genomics Knowledgebase.

Participants have 8 weeks to generate automatic structures and to enter the coordinates and conformational restraints into the CASD-NMR database. The reference structure will then become available for comparison, and the software used must also be made available.

An assessment of the progress made using ten data sets all coming from PSI NESG is set for mid-2010. It will be very interesting to find out how the software is doing.

Related articles

GPCR modelling: any good?

Removing the NMR bottleneck with help from ROSETTA

Maria Hodges

References

  1. A. Rosato, A. Bagaria, D. Baker, B. Bardiaux, A. Cavall et al. CASD-NMR: critical assessment of automated structure determination by NMR.
    Nature Meth. 6, 625-626 (2009) doi: 10.1038/nmeth0909-625.

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health