PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Design and Evolution: Molecular Sleuthing Reveals Drug Selectivity
June 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
CCR5 and HIV Infection
January 2015
Drug Targets: Bile Acids in Motion
September 2014
Drug Targets: S1R's Ligands and Partners
September 2014
P2Y Receptors and Blood Clotting
September 2014
Bacterial CDI Toxins
June 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Viroporins
March 2014
Microbial Pathogenesis: Targeting Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
February 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
Cancer Networks: IFI16-mediated p53 Activation
November 2013
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Finding Druggable Targets
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Identifying Dynamic Networks by CONTACT
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Infectious Diseases: Determining the Essential Structome
May 2013
NDM-1 and Antibiotics
May 2013
Microbial Pathogenesis: Computational Epitope Prediction
January 2013
Microbial Pathogenesis: Influenza Inhibitor Screen
January 2013
Microbial Pathogenesis: Measles Virus Attachment
January 2013
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Receptor bias
July 2012
Anthrax Stealth Siderophores
June 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Substrate specificity sleuths
April 2012
Reading out regioselectivity
December 2011
Superbugs and Antibiotic Resistance
December 2011
Terminal activation
December 2011
A change to resistance
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Breaking down the defenses
September 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Peptidoglycan binding: Calcium-free killing
June 2010
Treating sleeping sickness
May 2010
Bacterial spore kinase
April 2010
Antibiotics and Ribosome Function
March 2010
Safer Alzheimer's drugs?
March 2010
Anthrax evasion tactics
September 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
Antibiotic target
August 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Lysostaphin
July 2009
Tackling influenza
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Anthrax stealth molecule
March 2009
Drug targets to aim for
February 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Drug discovery

COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2010.48]
Featured Article - November 2010
Short description: Structural basis of COX inhibition suggests that adverse effects of NSAIDs will not be easily avoided.

Naproxen is one of the original non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that target the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes, yet the molecular basis of its interaction with COX enzymes has not been well established. Through a structure-activity-guided approach, Lawrence Marnett and colleagues uncover interactions that dictate naproxen binding to COX-2 and distinguish it from other NSAIDs that bind the COX enzymes.

There are at least four structural classes of molecules that characterize NSAIDs. Naproxen is a relatively simple molecule, containing three functional groups: an arylpropionic acid (carboxylate), a p-methoxy group and an α–methyl group on a naphthyl scaffold. As a drug, naproxen inhibits both COX-1 and COX-2 with comparable IC50s and exhibits gastrointestinal side effects, but reduced cardiovascular side effects relative to other selective as well as non-selective COX inhibitors.

To probe the interaction between naproxen and the COX enzymes, Marnett and colleagues mutated residues R120 and Y355 of murine COX-2 (mCOX-2), as these residues have been identified to mediate the canonical interaction of the arylcarboxylic acid family of NSAIDs. These mutations suggest that the carboxylate group of naproxen binds in the canonical orientation, coordinated to these two residues. To verify this and to identify other naproxen interactions with mCOX-2, the authors solved the co-crystal structure at 1.7 Å resolution.

This high resolution structure enabled visualization of solvent, ion and detergent molecules not observed in lower resolution structures of the COX enzymes, as well as subtle differences from existing co-crystal structures with COX-2. The naproxen-mCOX-2 complex also revealed a single orientation of naproxen within the COX-2 active site. Beyond the hydrogen-bonding interactions of the naproxen carboxylate group to R120 and Y355 predicted from the mutagenesis data, all other interactions are van der Waals contacts. W387 is an important residue at the top of the mCOX-2 active site. That naproxen was unable to inhibit a W387F mutant, whereas other NSAIDs like diclofenac and indomethacin could inhibit enzymatic activity suggests that an interaction between naproxen and this residue is specific to this NSAID.

Turning to mutagenesis of the naproxen molecule, the authors substituted the α–methyl group with hydrogen, ethyl or dimethyl substituents and found a loss of enzymatic potency with each of them, indicating that an (S)-methyl group at this position is critical. The co-structure shows that this group inserts into a small hydrophobic cleft below V349, which seems to anchor naproxen within the active site and reinforce the canonical binding orientation. A similar structure-activity relationship analysis of the naproxen p-methoxy group suggested the importance of this constituent at the top of the enzyme active site channel. Interestingly, p-ethyl and p-methylthio substitutions at this position still allowed inhibition of mCOX-2, but these compounds could not inhibit ovine COX-1. Also surprising was that both of these analogs inhibited the W387F COX-2 mutant as effectively as they inhibited the wild-type enzyme.

To follow up on these observations of COX-2 selectivity, the authors solved a second co-structure, this time between the p-methylthio naproxen derivative and mCOX-2. Compared to the naproxen co-structure, there was a shift of the carboxylate tails of the compounds and a new interaction between the naphthyl backbone of the p-methylthio naproxen, while many of the other interactions remain the same in the two co-structures.

These results define the contribution of the COX protein and naproxen atoms to the affinity and suggest that there is little tolerance for mutation in either component. This could tend to complicate any attempts to modify naproxen to eliminate the unwanted gastrointestinal side effects of the drug.

Mirella Bucci

References

  1. K. C. Duggan, M. J. Walters, J. Musee, J. M. Harp, J. R. Kiefer et al. Molecular basis for cyclooxygenase inhibition by the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, naproxen.
    J. Biol. Chem (1 September 2010). doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.162982

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health