PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Design and Evolution: Molecular Sleuthing Reveals Drug Selectivity
June 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
CCR5 and HIV Infection
January 2015
Drug Targets: Bile Acids in Motion
September 2014
Drug Targets: S1R's Ligands and Partners
September 2014
P2Y Receptors and Blood Clotting
September 2014
Bacterial CDI Toxins
June 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Viroporins
March 2014
Microbial Pathogenesis: Targeting Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
February 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
Cancer Networks: IFI16-mediated p53 Activation
November 2013
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Finding Druggable Targets
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Identifying Dynamic Networks by CONTACT
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Infectious Diseases: Determining the Essential Structome
May 2013
NDM-1 and Antibiotics
May 2013
Microbial Pathogenesis: Computational Epitope Prediction
January 2013
Microbial Pathogenesis: Influenza Inhibitor Screen
January 2013
Microbial Pathogenesis: Measles Virus Attachment
January 2013
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Receptor bias
July 2012
Anthrax Stealth Siderophores
June 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Substrate specificity sleuths
April 2012
Reading out regioselectivity
December 2011
Superbugs and Antibiotic Resistance
December 2011
Terminal activation
December 2011
A change to resistance
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Breaking down the defenses
September 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Peptidoglycan binding: Calcium-free killing
June 2010
Treating sleeping sickness
May 2010
Bacterial spore kinase
April 2010
Antibiotics and Ribosome Function
March 2010
Safer Alzheimer's drugs?
March 2010
Anthrax evasion tactics
September 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
Antibiotic target
August 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Lysostaphin
July 2009
Tackling influenza
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Anthrax stealth molecule
March 2009
Drug targets to aim for
February 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Drug discovery

ABA receptor diversity

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2010.49]
Featured Article - November 2010
Short description: There are 14 members in the ABA receptor family in Arabidopsis thaliana. How these receptors differ in their response to a synthetic, seed-specific ABA agonist is now explored in two independent papers, using a combination of crystallography, NMR and biochemical approaches.

Overlay of PYL2 and PYL1 loops.2

When plants encounter environmental stress conditions, such as drought, cold or high salinity, they can't just pick up and leave to find greener pastures. Instead, plants mount adaptive responses to survive such conditions, including closing of the leaf stomata, stimulating root growth and maintaining seeds and buds in a dormant state. All these physiological responses are mediated by plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA). Due to its potential agricultural applications, ABA signaling has been an active area of investigation. In particular, it was established that inhibition of type 2 protein phosphatases (PP2C) takes place in response to ABA, but the identity of the ABA receptor(s) remained undefined despite intensive research, with a few false candidates put forth.

Then, in 2009, several independent groups published genetic, biochemical and structural evidence that a family of proteins called PYR (for “pyrabactin resistance”), PYL (“PYR-like proteins”) or RCARs (“regulatory component of ABA receptor”) were the receptors for ABA. This body of work was highlighted as one of the scientific breakthroughs of 2009. The research showed that, when bound to ABA, PYR/PYL proteins interact with and inhibit PP2C. More specifically, the presence of ABA within the ligand-binding pocket of PYR/PYL proteins induced a conformational change (closure of 2 loops flanking the ligand binding pocket). Contributing to this breakthrough was the use of pyrabactin, a synthetic ABA agonist specific for response in seeds.

Now the structural basis for pyrabactin selective effects on PYR/PYL proteins are studied in atomic detail. Brian Volkman, Sean Cutler, George Phillips and colleagues (ref 1, PSI CESG) use multiple structural and biochemical approaches to show that pyrabactin adopts different conformations within the ligand binding pockets from different PYR/PYL. Crystal structures reveal that pyrabactin binding to PYR1 leads to closing of the loops and recruitment of PP2C, similar to the effect of ABA binding. In contrast, PYL2 is less responsive to pyrabactin, and this is explained by NMR data indicating that pyrabactin binds to the ligand-binding pocket in multiple conformations, including non-productive orientations, with the net result of inefficient loop closure. Substitution of Ile100 and Ile62 residues in the ligand-binding pocket of PYR1 led to variants that allowed non-productive orientation of pyrabactin.

An independent report, led by Karsten Melcher and Eric Xu (ref 2), also examines the effect of pyrabactin on different PYR/PYL proteins. In addition to confirming that pyrabactin does not promote the recruitment of PP2C to PYL2, the authors actually find that pyrabactin can compete with and inhibit the binding of ABA to PYL2; thus, pyrabactin is a PYL2-selective antagonist. The authors present crystal structures of PYL1-pyrabactin-PP2C and PYL2-pyrabactin complexes, observing features similar to those described above. They also show that mutations in residues within the ligand binding pockets of PYL1 or PYL2 can determine the effect of pyrabactin. Finally, the structural information on pyrabactin binding is used to identify compounds with agonist action on ABA receptors by computational docking, followed by in vitro validation.

Both of these studies indicate that the variations in the ligand-binding pocket of PYR/PYL members have a physiological role, and suggest that the regulation of ABA responses may involve endogenous signals other than ABA, as agonists or antagonists. They also pave the way for biotechnological applications, such as controlling stress tolerance and improving crop yields.

Inês Chen

References

  1. F. C. Peterson, E. S. Burgie, S.-Y. Park, D. R. Jensen, J. J. Weiner et al. Structural basis for selective activation of ABA receptors.
    Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1109-1113 (2010). doi:10.1038/nsmb.1898

  2. K. Melcher, Y. Xu, L.-M. Ng, X. E. Zhou, F.-F. Soon et al. Identification and mechanism of ABA receptor antagonism.
    Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1102-1108 (2010). doi:10.1038/nsmb.1887

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health