PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.3942/psi_sgkb/fm_2010_2]
Featured System - February 2010
Short description: Eukaryotic cells have an elaborate mechanism for adding sugar chains to their proteins.

Eukaryotic cells have an elaborate mechanism for adding sugar chains to their proteins. This builds an even greater diversity into the cell's proteome, expanding the possibilities that are available using amino acids encoded in the genome. As proteins are synthesized by ribosomes, sugar molecules are added at specific locations on their surfaces. This process is so important that upwards of 1% of the genome is devoted to the process of building these carbohydrates and adding them to proteins and other molecules. The carbohydrates play many functional roles: perhaps the most familiar is in blood, where variants of carbohydrate chains on the surface of red blood cells define the A/B/O blood types.

Building Carbohydrates

One important type of carbohydrate is added to proteins as they pass through the endoplasmic reticulum, bound for their ultimate locations inside or outside the cell. These carbohydrates are added to asparagines on the protein surface, and are thus called N-linked glycosides. These begin with a core of fourteen sugar groups linked into a branched chain, which may then be customized by further addition or removal of sugars. In the endoplasmic reticulum, this core carbohydrate chain is built on a dolichol molecule, which acts as a carrier as the chain is pieced together. Then, when it is finished, the whole thing is transferred to the protein.

Sugar Transfer

N-acetylglucosamine transferase performs the second step in the construction, adding the second sugar in the chain. The typical form of this enzyme is composed of a single protein chain with two structurally similar domains, one to hold the dolichol-sugar complex, and one to hold an activated form of the sugar that will be added. However, the enzyme in yeast is composed of two separate protein chains, termed Alg13 and Alg14, which perform these separate functions. This proved to be a boon for NMR spectroscopy, because the smaller sizes of the separate protein subunits make them amenable to structure solution. Researchers at NESG have recently solved the structure of Alg13 (shown here from entry 2jzc at the Protein Data Bank) and pinpointed the amino acids involved in its function (shown in green in the upper image).

Nucleotide Binding

Based on the sequence prediction, Alg13 was expected to have a typical Rossman-type fold, which is often found in proteins that bind to nucleotides. When the structure was solved, however, there was a surprise. The half of Alg13 that binds to the sugar-nucleotide donor does adopt the expected fold, but the other half was quite different. In fact, the fold of this half is different from anything seen in other glycosyltransferases that have been studied. This may be due to the unique functional constraints imposed by the need for Alg13 to cooperate with Alg14 in its reaction. The Jmol image below shows the similarity of Alg13 with one domain of the more typical glycosyltransterase MurG (PDB entry 1nlm).Click on the image to get an interactive version that highlights the structural differences.

The JSmol tab below displays an interactive JSmol

Phytochrome (PDB entries 2koi and 2kli)

The chromophore of phytochrome (in green) is derived from a heme group, which has been chemically modified to form a string of four connected rings. The ring at one end is covalently attached to a cysteine amino acid in the protein (shown in yellow), gluing the chromophore in place inside the protein. When the chromophore absorbs light, one bond (colored here in red) flips its conformation and causes a 90 degree rotation of the ring attached to the cysteine (this ring is colored brighter green h

References

  1. Wang, X., Weldeghiorghis, T., Zhang, G., Imperiali, B., Prestegard, J. H. (2008) Solution structure of Alg13: the sugar donor subunit of a yeast N-acetylglucosamine transferase. Structure 16, 965-975.

  2. Breton, C., Snajdrova, L., Jeanneau, C., Koca, J., Imberly, A. (2006) Structures and mechanisms of glycosyltransferases. Glycobiology 16, 29R-37R.

  3. Coutinho, P. M., Deleury, E., Davies, G. J., Henrissat, B. (2003) An evolving hierarchical family classification for glycosyltransferases. J. Mol. Biol. 328, 307-317.

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health