PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Channels and Transporters: BEST in Show
April 2015
Channels and Transporters: Reorienting a Peptide in the Pocket
April 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Refolding in Membrane Mimetic
March 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: A Cap on Transport
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Pumping Out Heavy Metal
April 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: A Funnel-like Viroporin
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Unveiling the Human α-helical Membrane Proteome
August 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Nanoparticles in Cell Camouflage
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Tuning Membrane Protein Expression
December 2012
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Building a Carrier
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Overexpressed problems
February 2012
Gentle membrane protein extraction
January 2012
Docking and rolling
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
Sugar transport
June 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
TrkH Potassium Ion Transporter
April 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Formate transporter or channel?
March 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins
January 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Surviving in an acid environment
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
You look familiar: the Type VI secretion system
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
Death clusters
March 2009
Protein nanopores
March 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
A pocket guide to GPCRs
December 2008
Tuning membrane protein overexpression
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Membrane proteins

Guard cells pick up the SLAC

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2010.53]
Featured Article - December 2010
Short description: Guard cells rely on anion channels to regulate stomata in response to environmental cues. A new crystal structure gives insight into how stomata close.

Ribbon diagram of the HiTehA trimer showing the central anion pores. Image provided by Yu-hang Chen and Wayne Hendrickson

The aptly named guard cells control the opening and closing of the leaf stomata, thereby controlling the influx of CO2 and evaporative loss of water. Proper regulation of the stomata is essential, as excessive water loss is devastating for plants, but insufficient CO2 intake is similarly harmful. It is well-established that guard cells control stomata through modulating their internal turgor pressure, which is regulated in part by anion channels such as slow anion channel 1 (SLAC1).

Only expressed in guard cells, SLAC1 has ten membrane-spanning helices, and its function is regulated via phosphorylation by OST1, a kinase that helps to mediate the cellular response to abscisic acid. SLAC1 homologs are found in plants and other organisms ranging from bacteria to fungi. Now, Hendrickson and colleagues (New York Consortium on Membrane Protein Structure (NYCOMPS) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Protein Structure Initiative (NIGMS-PSI) have taken advantage of one of those homologs to provide further insight into SLAC1 structure and function.

The authors examined homologs for Arabidopsis thaliana SLAC1 (AtSLAC1), and crystallized the closely related Haemophilus influenzae anion channel TehA (HiTehA). The crystal structure revealed that each protomer of trimeric HiTehA (and presumably AtSLAC1) has a novel fold: the ten transmembrane helices are organized as five tandemly repeated helical hairpins that are arranged to form a central anion pore. This pore is formed by five kinked helices and has a uniform diameter throughout. Gating of the pore is carried out by a highly conserved phenylalanine residue (HiTehA Phe262, AtSLAC1 Phe450) whose side group occludes the channel.

Two previous mutants that show impaired AtSLAC1 function have been described: slac1-1 and slac1-2. Mapping those mutations onto the structure reveals that the mutation in slac1-1 disrupts the pore structure, and that in slac1-2 blocks the pore. The authors further validate their structural model by creating an F450A mutant AtSLAC1 and showing that removal of the occluding phenyl group allows anions to flow freely through the channel, independently of phosphorylation by OST1. Additionally, as in the slac1-2 mutant the pore is blocked 'downstream' of Phe450, creating an F450A/slac1-2 double mutant results in the pore being permanently blocked. Crystal structures of HiTehA mutants F262A and G15D (mimicking AtSLAC1 F450A and slac1-2, respectively) show that the F262A mutant has a completely open pore, whereas the G15D mutant has a doubly occluded pore.

SLAC1 is most permeable to I and NO3, but the structure does not reveal any discernable ion-binding location, indicating that ion selectivity is determined by alternative factors. A comparison to other anion channels reveals that SLAC1 has a unique structure, consistent with its unique ion selectivity and regulation.

Questions still remain concerning SLAC1 activity. How phosphorylation by OST1 controls the flow of anions through the channel is not completely understood; the authors propose that it somehow causes shifting of the side group of Phe450 out of the pore. Also, slac1-2 protoplasts accumulate malate, but the authors saw minimal malate transport by SLAC1. How SLAC1 works in conjunction with other channels to maintain proper ionic concentrations in guard cells is also not completely clear.

From this study, it can be seen that guard cells use a phenylalanine gate to control access through the stomata. The structure of this SLAC1 homolog gives a picture of a complex channel and will form a solid base for future experiments.

Steve Mason

References

  1. Y.H. Chen, H. Lei, M. Punta, R. Bruni, B. Hillerich et al. Homologue structure of the SLAC1 anion channel for closing stomata in leaves.
    Nature 467, 1074-1080 (2010). doi:10.1038/nature09487

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health