PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

PASK staying active

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.01]
Featured Article - February 2011
Short description: The PAS-domain regulated kinase (PASK) has been implicated in nutrition sensing and signaling to facilitate a metabolic response to changing nutritional status. The crystal structure of PASK now indicates a basis for the unusual activation properties and substrate selectivity of this kinase.

Crystal structure of the PASK kinase domain bound to ADP.

Several kinases have been linked to sensing and responding to changing nutritional status, and these components are key to coordinating activities of the cell, such as growth and activation of relevant biochemical pathways, with metabolic demand. One such kinase is the Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domain–containing kinase PASK. Both mammalian and Saccharomyces cerevisiae PASK orthologs have been linked to sensing and responding to changes in metabolic status, but the substrates of mammalian PASK are unclear. Although PASK-mediated sensing is mysterious, it is likely to be a function of the PAS domain, given its role as a sensory module in light, oxygen and other sensing systems, as well as its ability to bind small molecules. The output of this sensing probably occurs through the canonical C terminal Ser–Thr kinase domain and Rutter, Burley and colleagues from the New York Structural Genomics Research Center (PSI NYSGXRC) have now solved the crystal structure of and characterized the kinase domain of human PASK.

Overall, the structure of the PASK kinase domain resembles a typical two-lobed kinase domain, with a β-sheet rich N-terminal lobe and a more α-helical C-terminal region. However, it contains an unusual β-hairpin in the N-terminal lobe region that is also found in the PIM1 protein kinase. Indeed, the PASK kinase domain shares aromatic residues with PIM1 in this region. This conservation, and the conserved nature of a number of residues in this region with those in other PASK orthologs, suggests that this unusual structural feature may be linked to regulation, an idea that merits further follow up.

PASK is also unusual in that the authors report that phosphorylation of the activation loop in the kinase is not required for function. Although most PASK orthologs retain a phosphorylatable residue—threonine—in this loop, mutation to alanine or a phosphomimetic residue does not alter kinase activity on an in vitro substrate or autocatalytic activity in vivo. Phosphorylation of this loop is thought to be a requirement for activity of many protein kinases, as it helps to promote interactions between the N and C lobes of the kinase, thus stabilizing the active conformation and substrate-binding interface. The structure does elucidate interactions that might compensate for the lack of a requirement for activation-loop phosphorylation. For example, in many eukaryotic protein kinases, a key lysine is thought to be involved in charge repulsion of a conserved so-called HRD loop in the inactive state, with phosphorylation of the activation loop then neutralizing the positive charge of the lysine. In both PIM1 and PASK, this lysine is altered to an alanine, suggesting that phosphorylation would not be required for neutralization in these cases. This is also true of another kinase that does not require phosphorylation of this activation loop for activity, CHK1, which also lacks a lysine and instead carries a threonine at this position. These and other observations suggest how it is that PASK activity does not depend on activation-loop phosphorylation, addressing one aspect of activity regulation, but the authors also go on to examine another mysterious aspect of PASK function, substrate specificity.

By screening a combinatorial peptide library, the authors take a first step toward examining this last question. On the basis of this analysis, PASK shares a preference for basic residues, and in particular arginine, with the CAMK kinase group at residue −3 relative to the phosphorylation site. Unusually however, it is selective for either histidine or arginine at the −5 position. In short, the human PASK structure suggests a basis for the unusual activity of this kinase, as well as elucidating its substrate preferences. This may facilitate an understanding of the regulation and the targets of this kinase, and thus may ultimately lead to a deeper understanding of metabolic sensing and the response to changes in the nutritional status of a cell.

Sabbi Lall

References

  1. C.K. Kikani et al. Structural basis of PAS domain-regulated kinase (PASK) activation in the absence of activation loop phosphorylation.
    J. Biol. Chem 285, 41034-41042 (2010). doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.157594

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health