PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Phytochrome

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.3942/psi_sgkb/fm_2010_4]
Featured System - April 2010
Short description: Most animals, including ourselves, use sophisticated eyes to see light.

Most animals, including ourselves, use sophisticated eyes to see light. The light-sensing mechanism in these eyes uses a specialized molecule that absorbs light and changes shape. You might be surprised to hear that plants also see light, and they use a similar chemical trick to see it. They build phytochrome proteins that enfold a light-sensing chromophore, which also changes shape when it absorbs a photon of light. These phytochromes, along with several other types of light-sensing proteins, are essential for the life of the plant. They allow plants to sense the levels and location of light, and thus maximize their ability to absorb the light for photosynthesis.

Light and Shade

Phytochromes are particularly adept at sensing the difference between full sunlight and shade. Phytochromes adopt two different states, termed Pr and Pfr. The Pr state is best at absorbing red light, which is found in full-sun conditions. When it absorbs red light, phytochrome converts to the Pfr state, which is better at absorbing far-red light. Far-red light is more indicative of shade, which is typically depleted of red light. The Pfr state can then convert back to the Pr state either by absorbing far-red light, or if it is in the dark for a while, by slow thermal conversion. Thus, this switch between Pr and Pfr states allows the plant to see if it is in the sun or the shade.

Taking Action

Of course, the plant needs to make use of this information once it gets it. Switching of phytochrome to the Pfr state launches a host of changes in the plant, causing it, for instance, to bend or grow towards the light. Phytochrome is normally found in the cytoplasm of the plant cell, but when it converts to the Pfr state, it moves to the nucleus and modulates the expression of many genes responsible for growth and shape of the plant.

Light-sensing Machinery

Researchers at the CESG have revealed the atomic basis of the light-sensing machinery in phytochromes. They have recently solved the structure of an unusually small phytochrome in both the Pr and Pfr states. The small size of the phytochrome was important in this study: it allowed the researchers to solve the structure quickly using NMR spectroscopy. The structure of the Pr state was solved first (PDB entries 2k2n and 2koi), then the protein was irradiated with red light during the NMR experiment. This produced a mixture of half Pr and half Pfr, which was used to solve the structure of the Pfr state (PDB entry 2kli, shown here). The structures show that the motion of the chromophore is completely different than what was expected. To explore the structure and motion of the chromophore, click on the image below for an interactive Jmol.

The JSmol tab below displays an interactive JSmol

RBBP9 (PDB entries 2qs9)

Retinoblastoma binding protein 9 is a small enzyme with a typical serine protease catalytic site. The three catalytic residues (serine 75, histidine 165 and aspartate 138) are shown with white carbon atoms here. Use the buttons below to switch to a spacefilling representation to see the active site groove that presumably recognizes the target protein. The LxCxE loop, which is important for binding to retinoblastoma protein, is shown with green carbon atoms. Mutation of the leucine (the sidechain

References

  1. Ulijasz, A. T., Cornilescu, G., Cornilescu, C. C., Zhang, J., Rivera, M., Markley, J. L. and Vierstra, R. D. (2008) Structural basis for the photoconversion of a phytochrome to the activated Pfr form. Nature 463, 250-254.

  2. Cornilescu, G., Ulijasz, A. T., Cornilescu, C. C., Markley, J. L. and Vierstra, R. D. (2008) Solution structure of a cyanobacterial phytochrome GAF domain in the red-light-absorbing ground state. J. Mol. Biol. 383, 403-413.

  3. Rockwell, N. C. and Lagarias, J. C. (2006) The structure of phytochrome: a picture is worth a thousand spectra. The Plant Cell 18, 4-14.

  4. Wagner, J. R., Brunselle, J. S., Forest, K. T. and Vierstra, R. D. (2005) A light-sensing knot revealed by the structure of the chromophore-binding domain of phytochrome. Nature 438, 325-331.

  5. Quail, P. H. (2002) Phytochrome photosensory signaling networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 85-93.

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health