PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Expanding the Reach of SAD
April 2015
Greasing the Path for SFX
January 2015
Time-Resolved Crystallography with HATRX
December 2014
Structures Without Damage
August 2014
Error Prevention
July 2014
A Refined Refinement Strategy
May 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Optimizing Damage
February 2014
Getting Better at Low Resolution
January 2014
Building a Structural Library
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Identifying Dynamic Networks by CONTACT
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
Fluorescence- and Chromatography-Based Protein Thermostability Assay
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Native phasing
August 2012
Smaller may be better
April 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Not so cool
December 2011
One from many
August 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Beyond crystals, solutions, and powders
May 2011
Snapshot crystallography
March 2011
FERM-ly bound
February 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
'Super-resolution' large complexes
December 2010
Proteinase K and Digalacturonic Acid
September 2010
Some crystals like it hot
May 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Tackling the phase problem
November 2009
Crystallizing glycoproteins
September 2009
Crystals from recalcitrant proteins
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
Chaperone-assisted crystallography
March 2009
An “X-ray” ruler
January 2009
Methylation boosts protein crystallization
December 2008

Technology Topics Crystallography

Snapshot crystallography

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.09]
Technical Highlight - March 2011
Short description: Two independent studies have now used femtosecond pulses from a hard-X-ray free electron laser to push forward the boundaries of structure determination.

Set up used by Chapman et al. for femtosecond nanocrystallography.

Although X-ray crystallography continues to offer glimpses of molecules at atomic resolution, there are hurdles that have to be overcome when using this powerful technology, an example being to grow crystals of sufficient size. One could use smaller crystals and increase the X-ray dose to still obtain a diffraction signal, but this approach is unfeasible, as damage to the sample comes into play. Using a hard-X-ray free electron laser (the Linac Coherent Light Source, or LCLS), two studies have now tried to break this barrier by using pulses of X-rays in the femtosecond range, that is, by attempting to use a timescale so fast as to outrun many damage processes.

In one study, Chapman, Fromme (PSI MPID) and colleagues used the technique to pursue a membrane complex—a complex type notorious for causing headaches to biologists seeking to elucidate structural information. The authors focused on one of the largest complexes previously solved by X-ray crystallography, Photosystem I. By passing a hydrated stream of nanocrystals (2 nm to 2 μm in size) past the source, the authors essentially took snapshots of individual crystals if they happened to be intercepted by an X-ray pulse (photon energy 1.8 keV). The stream constantly replenishes sample, so that in the end the data consist of a series of snapshots of Photosystem I, suggesting that the technology may one day be taken in the direction of examining time-resolved reaction steps. In addition, greater control over the sample relative to the X-ray pulses might lead to even less sample material being required. The structure was presented at 8.5 Å, but use of X-rays of shorter wavelength is likely to increase this resolution further.

In the second study, Hadju, Abergel and colleagues were able to image single mimivirus particles. Mimivirus is the largest known virus, at about 0.45 μm in diameter, and it is difficult to obtain structural information by even cryo-EM because of its size. Here the authors used aerosolized particles and captured snapshots of individual viruses that randomly intercepted LCLS pulses. As in the Photosystem I study, they observed little sample deterioration during the course of the study. The individual mimivirus reconstructions are similar in size and shape to those observed previously by EM. However, the inside of the viral particle was variable, and further analysis may reveal whether there is indeed structural heterogeneity of components in the viral shell. The resolution in this study was at around 32 nm, with shorter, more intense pulses again likely to push this boundary.

The two studies provide great promise for development to further push forward the limits of structural determination and will initiate further work that will hopefully help to widen the bottleneck that is currently represented by crystal growth.

Sabbi Lall

References

  1. H.N. Chapman et al. Femtosecond X-ray protein nanocrystallography.
    Nature 470, 73-77 (2011). doi:10.1038/nature09750

  2. M.M. Seibert et al. Single mimivirus particles intercepted and imaged with an X-ray laser.
    Nature 470, 78-81 (2011). doi:10.1038/nature09748

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health