PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Channels and Transporters: BEST in Show
April 2015
Channels and Transporters: Reorienting a Peptide in the Pocket
April 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Refolding in Membrane Mimetic
March 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: A Cap on Transport
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Pumping Out Heavy Metal
April 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: A Funnel-like Viroporin
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Unveiling the Human α-helical Membrane Proteome
August 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Nanoparticles in Cell Camouflage
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Tuning Membrane Protein Expression
December 2012
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Building a Carrier
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Overexpressed problems
February 2012
Gentle membrane protein extraction
January 2012
Docking and rolling
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
Sugar transport
June 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
TrkH Potassium Ion Transporter
April 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Formate transporter or channel?
March 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins
January 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Surviving in an acid environment
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
You look familiar: the Type VI secretion system
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
Death clusters
March 2009
Protein nanopores
March 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
A pocket guide to GPCRs
December 2008
Tuning membrane protein overexpression
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Membrane proteins

Sugar transport

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.21]
Featured Article - June 2011
Short description: The structure of an EIIC from Bacillus cereus shows the architecture of this important class of sugar transporters.

Structure of the ChbC dimer, as viewed from within the plane of the membrane. [PDB: 3QNQ]

Sugar uptake into bacteria is mediated by phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems (PTSs) that transport saccharides across the cell membrane and phosphorylate them before their release into the cytosol. Phosphorylation of the sugar ensures its unidirectional flux and primes it for consumption through metabolic cycles that generate energy. PTSs consist of enzyme I and heat-stable phosphocarrier protein, which are general energy-coupling proteins, and the sugar-specific enzyme II (EII), a complex consisting of the cytosolic proteins EIIA and EIIB and the integral membrane protein EIIC. The phosphate group originates from phosphoenolpyruvate and is transferred sequentially by components of the PTS and eventually to the incoming sugar substrate bound to EIIC, which translocates the substrate and assists its phosphorylation. To provide insight into the substrate selectivity, phosphorylation and translocation mechanisms, Cao et al. (PSI NYCOMPS) determined the crystal structure of an EIIC, the ChbC homologue from Bacillus cereus, which transports diacetylchitobiose (GlcNaAc)2.

Heterologously expressed and purified protein forms a stable dimer and, once reconstituted into proteoliposomes, was shown to transport sugars with a preference for (GlcNaAc)2. Each ChbC protomer consists of ten transmembrane domains (TMs), two oppositely oriented re-entrant hairpin structures and two horizontal amphipathic α-helices. The structure of the dimer has the shape of a capsized canoe, with a concave surface facing the intracellular side. The extensive, largely hydrophobic dimer interface is formed primarily by transmembrane domains in the N-terminal half of ChbC, whereas the C-terminal half contains a deep, electronegative cleft on its intracellular side. This cleft is lined partly by the re-entrant hairpin loops, one of which contains a highly conserved glutamic acid residue. Interestingly, the arrangement of the hairpin loops resembles two re-entrant hairpin loops in the otherwise dissimilar structure of the glutamate transporter GltPh.

Although it was impossible to unambiguously determine the orientation of the (GlcNaAc)2 molecule in the protomer structure, the authors were able to model the phosphorylation active site comprising the conserved glutamic acid residue and a conserved histidine residue, together with the sixth-position hydroxyl group of the nonreducing sugar (C6-OH), which is known to be phosphorylated in Escherichia coli ChbC. However, the catalytic mechanism remains currently unknown. Modeling of different sugar substrates into the binding pocket suggests that it is well suited for (GlcNaAc)2, although it may be able to accommodate a trisaccharide as well.

The location of the sugar-binding pocket suggests that the structure represents the occluded state, implying the existence of at least two additional states, the outward-open state, which can bind substrate from the periplasm, and the inward-open state, which interacts with EIIB to phosphorylate and release the substrate into the cytoplasm. The loop between TM4 and TM5 seals off the cavity to the intracellular side and could potentially move away to expose the bound substrate, which makes it an ideal candidate for the intracellular gate. The similarities between the transport domain of GltPh and the C-terminal region of ChbC could provide further insight into how the occluded state might convert to an outward-open state by a rigid-body motion, facilitated by the extracellular loop between TM7 and TM8. Further structural studies will be necessary to shed light on these other transport states.

Arianne Heinrichs

References

  1. Y. Cao et al. Crystal structure of a phosphorylation-coupled saccharide transporter.
    Nature 473, 50-54 (6 April 2011). doi:10.1038/nature09939

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health