PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Expanding the Reach of SAD
April 2015
Greasing the Path for SFX
January 2015
Time-Resolved Crystallography with HATRX
December 2014
Structures Without Damage
August 2014
Error Prevention
July 2014
A Refined Refinement Strategy
May 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Optimizing Damage
February 2014
Getting Better at Low Resolution
January 2014
Building a Structural Library
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Identifying Dynamic Networks by CONTACT
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
Fluorescence- and Chromatography-Based Protein Thermostability Assay
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Native phasing
August 2012
Smaller may be better
April 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Not so cool
December 2011
One from many
August 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Beyond crystals, solutions, and powders
May 2011
Snapshot crystallography
March 2011
FERM-ly bound
February 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
'Super-resolution' large complexes
December 2010
Proteinase K and Digalacturonic Acid
September 2010
Some crystals like it hot
May 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Tackling the phase problem
November 2009
Crystallizing glycoproteins
September 2009
Crystals from recalcitrant proteins
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
Chaperone-assisted crystallography
March 2009
An “X-ray” ruler
January 2009
Methylation boosts protein crystallization
December 2008

Technology Topics Crystallography

Rosetta hone

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.28]
Technical Highlight - July 2011
Short description: A method using structural modeling tools to improve molecular replacement promises to allow structural determination for cases that resist solution by current methods.

Model and density from data set 6 using an energy-optimized model as the source of phase information. Reprinted from Nature. 1

Molecular replacement is a method for solving the phase problem of X-ray diffraction data sets. The approach relies on the existence of a known protein structure with some homology to the unknown structure, but it is not very successful with low levels of homology (less than 30% sequence identity). However, even poor initial electron density maps are rich with information, and Baker and colleagues (PSI JCSG and NESG) have now applied Rosetta, an energy-guided optimization method, to hone initial models generated from these maps. These improved molecular-replacement models were then passed into crystallographic model building techniques and Rfree used to assess the success of the method. The data were also assessed by the groups that provided the starting intractable data sets. The authors examined 18 data sets that were refractory to solution by previous methods and, of the 13 that could not also be solved by other methods, 8 were ultimately considered solved using the Rosetta refinement method. The authors extensively compared the method to others, including simulated annealing, arguing that it consistently performed strongly. In addition, by examining performance with comparison to homologs of differing sequence identity, the method was found to perform well above 20% identity. Although the method requires that there be fewer than four copies in the asymmetric unit and that the resolution be 3.2 Å or better, it promises to greatly increase the set of structures that are in the realm of solution by molecular replacement.

Sabbi Lall

References

  1. DiMaio, F. et al. Improved molecular replacement by density- and energy-guided protein structure optimization.
    Nature 473, 540-543 (2011). doi:10.1038/nature09964

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health