PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Channels and Transporters: BEST in Show
April 2015
Channels and Transporters: Reorienting a Peptide in the Pocket
April 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Refolding in Membrane Mimetic
March 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: A Cap on Transport
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Pumping Out Heavy Metal
April 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: A Funnel-like Viroporin
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Unveiling the Human α-helical Membrane Proteome
August 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Nanoparticles in Cell Camouflage
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Tuning Membrane Protein Expression
December 2012
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Building a Carrier
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Overexpressed problems
February 2012
Gentle membrane protein extraction
January 2012
Docking and rolling
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
Sugar transport
June 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
TrkH Potassium Ion Transporter
April 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Formate transporter or channel?
March 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins
January 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Surviving in an acid environment
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
You look familiar: the Type VI secretion system
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
Death clusters
March 2009
Protein nanopores
March 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
A pocket guide to GPCRs
December 2008
Tuning membrane protein overexpression
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Membrane proteins

Overexpressed problems

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.64]
Technical Highlight - February 2012
Short description: An analysis of the effects of protein overexpression gives insight into the difficulties of preparing intramembrane proteins for crystallization.

Electron micrographs of E. coli wild-type cells (top) and cells overexpressing an IMP (middle) or soluble protein (bottom). Figure courtesy of Francesca Gubellini.

Despite the recent publication of several breakthrough, high-resolution crystal structures of intramembrane proteins (IMPs), the production of IMPs for structural determination remains challenging. Protein toxicity is a frequent roadblock, widely believed to be related to the limited capacity of the host cell to properly fold and accommodate overexpressed IMPs. However, some IMPs can be highly expressed while others are toxic even at low levels; thus, these limitations cannot be generalized.

To understand the basis of overexpressed IMP toxicity, Hunt and colleagues (PSI NYCOMPS) have now extensively analyzed the response of Escherichia coli to the overexpression of six proteins (including four IMPs). Two of the most toxic IMPs, E. coli GlpT and Helicobacter pylori HP1206, caused similar global gene expression changes, and overexpression caused a more elongated morphology compared to control cells. However, cells overexpressing soluble proteins shared most of these changes, although to a lesser extent than those overexpressing IMPs. Surprisingly, cells overexpressing either soluble proteins or IMPs did not present the standard stationary-phase transcriptional response, nor were the heat-shock response and/or envelope-stress systems upregulated, and no major changes were seen in the expression of genes encoding metabolic enzymes. The absence of these expected responses indicates that there is no inherent deterrent to IMP production in E. coli.

Instead of a general barrier, the results suggest that the toxicities due to IMP overexpression may be related to the behavior of the target proteins themselves. This was supported by the finding that the toxicity of E. coli GlpT overexpression was related to its glycerol transport activity and by the discovery of a spontaneous mutation in E. coli MsbA that reduced its toxicity and its transport activity, as well as spontaneous missense mutations in HP1206. Given that the toxicity of a target IMP likely depends on its activity, the authors suggest that using alternative strains that are less susceptible to the effects of a specific protein may result in improved expression of IMPs. They also suggest that selection of activity-reducing mutations during overexpression may be an unappreciated source of heterogeneity impeding IMP crystallization.

Steve Mason

References

  1. F. Gubellini et al. Physiological response to membrane protein overexpression in E. coli.
    Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 10, M111.007930 (2011). doi:10.1074/mcp.M111.007930

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health