PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Twist to open

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.66]
Featured Article - March 2012
Short description: A structure of an engineered potassium channel suggests a novel model for the gating mechanism.

Inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir) channels function in a wide range of cell types to regulate membrane excitability, and abnormal function is increasingly associated with disease states. The prokaryotic KirBac channels are homologs of the tetrameric eukaryotic Kir channels and have provided detailed structural insights into the molecular mechanisms of gating. Ion transport occurs when conformational changes in the large cytoplasmic domains (CTD) result in an open conformation of the bundle-crossing gate. Mechanistic insights depend on trapping KirBac channels in different gating conformations.

Schematic of gating model based on the KirBac3.1 S129R structure showing the conformational transition between the closed (blue) and open (red) forms dependent on the twist conformation of the cytoplasmic domain. Figure courtesy of Stephen Tucker.

Tucker, Vénien-Bryan and colleagues have solved the structure of a functionally active mutant of KirBac3.1 in which an S129R substitution in the inner pore-lining helix (TM2) allowed the first observation of the gate in an apparently open conformation. Electrostatic and steric repulsion by the introduced arginine mimics the open state of the wild-type channel, as evidenced by an increase in intersubunit distance between the Tyr132 residues in TM2 that form the primary gate. In addition, the TM2 helix both bends at and rotates around the highly conserved G120 hinge residue while the outer TM1 helix is displaced outward. The TM2 rotation also causes an outward movement of the Leu124 residue that forms the secondary gate within the central cavity, resulting in an increased effective pore diameter.

Importantly, the structure challenges a recent model that suggests that a twist conformation of the CTD with respect to the pore is not ion-conductive. Since the active S129R mutant has both a twist conformation of the CTD and ion occupancy at all four potassium binding sites, the authors conclude that the structure represents an active state. They propose a gating model based on an intricate network of intra- and intersubunit contacts involving the C-linker between the CTD and TM2. Comparison with a closed non-twist structure highlights how the C-linker couples CTD twist movement to pore opening to stabilize the open state. The authors note that while the S129R structure may not be in a fully open conformation, comparison with an open structure of the KcsA potassium channel supports their model. The new structure extends our knowledge of the dynamics of KirBac channels during ion transport.

Michael A. Durney

References

  1. V.N. Bavro et al. Structure of a KirBac channel with an open bundle crossing indicates a mechanism for channel gating.
    Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 158-163 (2012). doi:10.1038/nsmb.2208

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health