PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
The Immune System: A Strong Competitor
June 2013
The Immune System: Strand Swapping for T-Cell Inhibition
June 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Morph to Assemble
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Reading Between the Lines
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: When the Sum Is Greater than the Parts
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Reading out regioselectivity
December 2011
An effective and cooperative dimer
November 2011
PDZ domains: sometimes it takes two
November 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
A growing family
February 2011
FERM-ly bound
February 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Spot protein-protein interactions… fast
March 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Two-component signaling
December 2009
ABA receptor...this time for real?
November 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Vav1 and Rho GTPase Rac1
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008

Research Themes Protein-protein interactions

Topping off the proteasome

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.67]
Featured Article - March 2012
Short description: The structure of the entire proteasome complex provides insight into key functions while raising questions for future studies.

Proteins are marked for degradation when they become damaged or misfolded, or when they are no longer needed by the cell. The proteasome is the primary complex responsible for protein degradation. The covalent attachment of a series of ubiquitin molecules to proteins enables the proteasome to recognize and degrade these doomed substrates. By controlling the levels of a multitude of proteins in the cell, the proteasome plays an important role in regulating key cellular processes such as the cell cycle and transcription, and is therefore a target for cancer therapeutics.

Negative-stain reconstruction of the holoenzyme shows locations of the core (grey), lid (yellow) and base (cyan). Figure courtesy of Andreas Martin.

A recent study by Martin and colleagues has revealed the structure of the entire proteasome holoenzyme by electron microscopy. While previous studies had defined the structure of the proteasomal proteolytic core, a barrel-shaped subcomplex into which unfolded substrates are fed for subsequent cleavage, there was limited structural information on the regulatory particle. This particle sits atop the proteolytic core, consists of a lid and a base subcomplex, and is responsible for substrate recognition, deubiquitination, unfolding, and translocation into the core.

The new structural information on the proteasome holoenzyme reveals the positions of the twelve non-ATPases of the regulatory particle, including the deubiquitinase Rpn11 found in the lid, as well as the six AAA+ ATPases of the base. The authors highlight several features of the structure which explain the mechanism for key functions of the regulatory particle while also raising questions that will influence future studies. For example, the structure reveals unexpected interactions between the lid and the core and between the lid and the motor domains of base subunits. The role of these interactions in the function of the proteasome remains to be determined. Other interactions, however, help explain the findings of previous functional studies on the proteasome. This is evident in the consistency of the spatial arrangement of the ubiquitin binding proteins and the deubiquitinase with studies indicating that a minimum of four K48-linked ubiquitins must be attached to the substrate for efficient degradation by the proteasome.

Jennifer Cable

References

  1. G. C. Lander et al. Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle.
    Nature. Published online 11 January 2012. doi:10.1038/10774

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health