PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Molecular Portraits of the Cell
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Updating ModBase
January 2015
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Cancer Networks: Predicting Catalytic Residues from 3D Protein Structures
November 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Infectious Diseases: Targeting Meningitis
May 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Refining protein structure prediction
March 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Devil is in the details
January 2012
Playing while you work
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Fit to serve
October 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Structure from sequence
July 2011
An easier solution for symmetry
June 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Modeling RNA structures
May 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Network coverage
November 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Protein modeling made easy
July 2009
Model proteins in your lunch break
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008
Modeling with SAXS
October 2008
Designing activity
September 2008

Technology Topics Modeling

Refining protein structure prediction

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.68]
Technical Highlight - March 2012
Short description: Molecular dynamics simulations are shown to systematically improve template-based models of protein structure.

The large number of protein structures that have been experimentally solved makes it possible, when confronted with the sequence of a new protein, to make predictions about its structure. But doing this accurately and at atomic resolution remains challenging.

Superposition of the initial model (green), the refined model (blue) and the native structure (red) of TR614. Figure courtesy of Yang Zhang.

A standard approach to structure prediction involves the alignment of the query protein sequence to a template with known structure: in aligned regions, template structure then guides predictions for the query protein. Multi-template methods in particular can generate reasonable predictions, but the resulting models often have problematic local distortions. Zhang and colleagues now systematically test the use of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, in which the positions of all atoms are modeled from fundamental physical principles, to refine template-based protein structure predictions.

The authors begin with a structural model for the query protein generated by the I-TASSER pipeline (a multiple template approach) and use models of either the full-length protein or of defined subfragments to search through the PDB. Global or local fragment templates identified in this way are used to generate distance maps that are then applied to constrain the MD simulation and refine the original model. The simulation employs the AMBER99 force field and also incorporates knowledge-based H-bonding and repulsive potentials. Zhang and colleagues name their approach Fragment-Guided Molecular Dynamics (FG-MD).

On a benchmark set of 181 proteins with known (and diverse) structures, FG-MD resulted in structural predictions that are closer to the native protein structure, based on several standard metrics. The greatest benefit accrued from local fragment restraints and the most substantial quality improvement was on models with strong starting structures. The authors propose that FG-MD serves to guide the simulations through a funnel-shaped intermediate energy landscape to a more native structure.

Finally, FG-MD was tested on datasets from Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP), retrospectively on 12 proteins from the CASP8 experiment and on a further 14 proteins as part of the CASP9 challenge. On these datasets as well, FG-MD consistently improved structure predictions and brought the models closer to the native structure.

Natalie de Souza

References

  1. Zhang J. et al. Atomic-level protein structure refinement using fragment-guided molecular dynamics conformation sampling.
    Structure 19, 1784-1795 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.09.022

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health