PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons

Related Articles
Automating NMR Structures
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: A TRiC-ster that Follows the Rules
March 2015
Virology: Making Sensitive Magic
March 2014
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Inhibition Through Allostery
July 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Automatic NMR
September 2012
NMR structure test
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
S is for solubility
June 2012
Blind faith
April 2012
Follow the RNA leader
December 2011
Making invisible proteins visible
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Molecular replacement by magnetic resonance
August 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
No more labeled lipids
May 2011
Capsid assembly in motion
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Solving homodimeric structures with NMR
November 2010
CASD-NMR: assessing automated structure determination by NMR
June 2010
Peptidoglycan binding: Calcium-free killing
June 2010
Removing the NMR bottleneck
April 2010
NMR has its wiki way
March 2010
Extremely salty
February 2010
The future of NMR
September 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
Faster solid-state NMR
May 2009
Powerful NMR
April 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008

Blind faith

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.73]
Technical Highlight - April 2012
Short description: A rigorous assessment of automated NMR structure determination demonstrates the reliability of the method.

Protein structure determination by NMR spectroscopy requires complete chemical shift assignments and manual analysis of thousands of atomic interactions known as nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs). Recently developed algorithms use these data to calculate structures in automated, iterative NOE assignment protocols. Additional methods have emerged that rely on the intrinsic structural information encoded in the chemical shifts supplemented with NOE data.

Rosato and colleagues (PSI NESG) present the results of CASD-NMR, a blind assessment of how the available automated methods compare with the traditional manual approach. The authors stringently evaluated the results for ten structure determinations of monomeric proteins ranging in size from 60 to 150 amino acids. They assessed three groups of automated methods using either NOE or chemical shift data, or a combination of both. The accuracy and convergence of the automatically calculated structures was compared to manually solved reference structures using the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of structured backbone regions.

Setting a threshold for accuracy at an RMSD of 2 Å from the reference structures, the authors found that three of the four NOE-based methods consistently generated accurate structures for at least 90% of the targets. Methods that primarily use chemical shift data supplemented with or filtered by NOE restraints yielded acceptable structures in 70% of cases, while computationally expensive methods that use only chemical shift data performed poorly. Using crystal structures of homologs for two of the targets, the authors were able to construct reliable models with acceptable RMSD deviations to both automated and reference structures. In one notable case, both the automated and reference structures were closer to the DNA-bound crystal structure, indicating that the free protein in solution also adopts the bound conformation.

Further analysis revealed that correct geometric and stereochemical parameters are necessary but not sufficient to guarantee accurate structures. The authors propose an alternative quality measure that quantifies the agreement with the experimental data. Overall, the study has established the reliability of NOE-based methods in unsupervised automated solution structure determination of proteins of up to 150 amino acids in size.

Michael A. Durney


  1. A. Rosato et al. Blind testing of routine, fully automated determination of protein structures from NMR data.
    Structure 20, 227-236 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.01.002

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health