PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
The Immune System: A Strong Competitor
June 2013
The Immune System: Strand Swapping for T-Cell Inhibition
June 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Morph to Assemble
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Reading Between the Lines
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: When the Sum Is Greater than the Parts
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Reading out regioselectivity
December 2011
An effective and cooperative dimer
November 2011
PDZ domains: sometimes it takes two
November 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
A growing family
February 2011
FERM-ly bound
February 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Spot protein-protein interactions… fast
March 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Two-component signaling
December 2009
ABA receptor...this time for real?
November 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Vav1 and Rho GTPase Rac1
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008

Research Themes Protein-protein interactions

The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2011.82]
Featured Article - June 2012
Short description: The crystal structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex is reported.

The structure of the MCC complex. Mad2 is green, Mad3 is cyan and Cdc20 is yellow. The KEN box residues are in red ball-and-stick. 1

Proper chromosome segregation is ensured in part by the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), which detects free chromosome ends and delays cell division until all chromosomes are attached to the mitotic spindle. This is called the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). The MCC implements the SAC by inhibiting the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), the E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in protein degradation required for chromosomes to segregate.

Barford and colleagues have taken a structural approach to studying the molecular machines involved in the SAC. They solved the crystal structure of the fission yeast MCC, consisting of the proteins Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20, to 2.3Å resolution (PDB 4AEZ). The structure was obtained using the closed form of Mad2.

The MCC has a roughly triangular architecture. The helix–loop–helix motif of Mad3 interacts with Mad2 via its α-C helix and β8′–β8″ hairpin. This hairpin is known to undergo a substantial conformational change upon transition of Mad2 from the closed to the open state; the crystal structure thus satisfyingly reveals why it is only the closed form of Mad2 that can interact with Mad3.

Furthermore, the structure provides molecular insight into how Cdc20 recognizes APC/C substrates. Cdc20 is a co-activator of APC/C and recognizes its substrates via their KEN (Lys-Glu-Asn) box and D box motifs. In the context of the MCC, Mad2 and Mad3 function to inhibit Cdc20 substrate recognition. Mad3 has been proposed to be a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of Cdc20, blocking its access to APC/C substrates. Barford and colleagues thus studied the Mad3-Cdc20 interaction for clues into APC/C substrate recognition by co-activators.

They observed the KEN-box-binding site of Cdc20 on the top of its WD40 domain, and the D-box-binding site within a channel between blades 1 and 7 of the WD40 β-propeller. They confirmed the D-box-binding site by mutagenesis of the equivalent residues in the co-activator Cdh1 and used structural information about binding site disposition on Cdc20 to design peptide inhibitors of APC/C in complex with Cdh1. Finally, the authors docked the MCC structure into an electron microscopy-based molecular envelope model of APC/C-MCC to observe how Cdc20 substrate recognition is inhibited by Mad2 and Mad3 within the larger complex.

Natalie de Souza

References

  1. W.C.H. Chao et al. Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex.
    Nature 484, 208-l213 (2012). doi:10.1038/nature10896

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health