PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Retrospective: Producing Proteins the PSI:Biology Way
July 2015
Immunity: Conformational Capture
June 2014
Coaxing Rare Codons
February 2014
Caught in the Act
December 2013
Membrane Proteome: Tuning Membrane Protein Expression
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag
November 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
S is for solubility
June 2012
Overexpressed problems
February 2012
Gentle membrane protein extraction
January 2012
No more labeled lipids
May 2011
Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins
January 2010
One system to express them all
November 2009
Crystallizing glycoproteins
September 2009
GFP to the rescue
July 2009
Solve your solubility problems
June 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
Speedy cloning and mutagenesis for structural genomics
January 2009
Tuning membrane protein overexpression
October 2008

Technology Topics Protein Expression

Insert Here

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2012.103]
Technical Highlight - October 2012
Short description: A method to identify fusion partners for GPCRs can lead to new structures.

Superposition of A2AAR-BRIL (green), A2AAR-T4L (yellow) and A2AAR (blue). Figure courtesy of Michael Hanson and Eugene Chun.

Despite their importance and ubiquity in key cellular processes, relatively few crystal structures of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are available. Like other transmembrane receptors, the structural characterization of GPCRs has been slowed by difficulties in expressing, purifying and crystallizing these proteins. As a result, researchers have had to employ alternative methods to make these proteins more amenable to structural analyses. One such workaround consists of replacing the unstructured third intracellular loop (ICL3) with a soluble protein or domain—most commonly the T4 lysozyme (T4L).

While insertion of T4L into ICL3 has proven successful in crystallizing and solving the structures of several GPCRs, many others have remained intractable to this technique. To expand the number of tools available for improving the crystallization of GPCRs, Hanson, Stevens and colleagues (PSI GPCR Network) have identified and characterized new GPCR fusion proteins to provide alternatives to T4L chimeras.

To find suitable fusion partners, the authors screened the PDB for proteins and domains based on size, charge and other criteria. Eventually, five proteins were chosen and inserted into the ICL3 of the GPCRs A2AAR and β2AR. After optimizing the region flanking the insertion site and analyzing the thermostability of the fusion proteins, one A2AAR and one β2AR fusion construct were crystallized, each partnered with thermostabilized cytochrome b562 (A2AAR-BRIL and β2AR-BRIL), The crystal structure of A2AAR-BRIL (PDB 4EIY) showed a higher similarity to a thermostabilized version of A2AAR (PDB 3PWH), in which ICL3 is intact, than did A2AAR-T4L (PDB 3EML), in which the insertion of T4L caused distortions in the helices of A2AAR. These types of structural analyses and comparisons may lead to the rational design of GPCR-fusion domain junctions to improve protein stability and solubility.

This work not only expands the repertoire of GPCRs and possibly other proteins that are amenable to structural analyses, but also has the potential to provide a general framework in screening for improved fusion domains for a variety of purposes.

Jennifer Cable

References

  1. E. Chun et al. Fusion partner toolchest for the stabilization and crystallization of G protein-coupled receptors.
    Structure. 20, 967-976 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.04.010

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health