PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Channels and Transporters: BEST in Show
April 2015
Channels and Transporters: Reorienting a Peptide in the Pocket
April 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Refolding in Membrane Mimetic
March 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: A Cap on Transport
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Pumping Out Heavy Metal
April 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: A Funnel-like Viroporin
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Unveiling the Human α-helical Membrane Proteome
August 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Nanoparticles in Cell Camouflage
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Tuning Membrane Protein Expression
December 2012
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Building a Carrier
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Overexpressed problems
February 2012
Gentle membrane protein extraction
January 2012
Docking and rolling
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
Sugar transport
June 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
TrkH Potassium Ion Transporter
April 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Formate transporter or channel?
March 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins
January 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Surviving in an acid environment
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
You look familiar: the Type VI secretion system
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
Death clusters
March 2009
Protein nanopores
March 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
A pocket guide to GPCRs
December 2008
Tuning membrane protein overexpression
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Membrane proteins

Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2012.109]
Technical Highlight - November 2012
Short description: A tag variation strategy enables increased membrane protein production.

Tag fragments are generated by PCR, and are subsequently combined with amplified targets to generate the linear templates for cell-free expression. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier. 1

Membrane proteins such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are infamously difficult to express, and much effort has been dedicated to developing cell-free expression systems and optimizing recombinant protein production. One tripping point involves translation initiation, where the formation of secondary structures in the mRNA 5′ end can impede ribosome binding. This has been overcome for some proteins by tagging targets with 5′ sequences, including those from outer membrane protein A and green fluorescent protein (GFP) genes.

Based on these successes, Bernhard and colleagues (PSI MPSbyNMR)established a tag variation strategy to optimize production of low-expressing targets in a cell-free system. To minimize the effect on protein structure, they designed small, 6–8 residue tags, followed by a PreScission protease cleavage site. The seven tags driven by the T7 promoter with a subsequent ribosome-binding site ranged from a tag with 100% AT content, which forms less stable secondary structures, to one based on the commonly used hemagglutinin tag and another based on the first codons of GFP, as well as a random sequence tag and a longer, previously used T7 tag.

The authors optimized the construction strategy by using common primers. Comparison of expression efficiencies in the cell-free system using linear and vector templates revealed that the former can be used directly without compromising yield—an additional time and cost savings.

As proof of concept, the group applied this strategy to a set of GPCRs. While tagging only moderately increased expression of reasonably well-expressed proteins, substantial improvement was achieved for GPCRs that were otherwise poorly expressed. Most impressive was the improvement from 0.08 to 2.33 mg/ml for glucagone-like peptide 1 receptor. For different proteins, best expression was achieved with different tags, and based on the results, four expression tags (the AT-tag, the H-tag, the G-tag and the SER-tag) are recommended for screening.

Tagged GPCRs produced using this system had expected α-helical folds and were of sufficient quality. Going further, the authors optimized the best tag by removing the PreScission site and subsequently truncating the tag. This approach should prove beneficial for the production of this important class of proteins.

Irene Kaganman

References

  1. S. Haberstock et al. A systematic approach to increase the efficiency of membrane protein production in cell-free expression systems.
    Protein Expr. Purif. 82, 308-316 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.pep.2012.01.018

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health