PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Bespoke Design of Repeat Proteins
June 2015
Design and Evolution: Molecular Sleuthing Reveals Drug Selectivity
June 2015
Design and Evolution: Tunable Antibody Binders
June 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Evolution of Photoconversion
June 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: A TRiC-ster that Follows the Rules
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Beneficial Aggregation
March 2015
Peptidyl-carrier Proteins
October 2014
Predicting Protein Crystal Candidates
October 2014
Protein and Peptide Synthesis: Coming Full Circle
October 2014
Protein and Peptide Synthesis: Sensing Energy Balance
October 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Polysaccharide Metabolism in the Human Gut
May 2014
Design and Discovery: Evolutionary Dynamics
January 2014
Design and Discovery: Identifying New Enzymes and Metabolic Pathways
January 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
Caught in the Act
December 2013
Microbiome: Insights into Secondary Bile Acid Synthesis
September 2013
Microbiome: Structures from Lactic Acid Bacteria
September 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Design and Discovery: A Cocktail for Proteins Without ID
February 2013
Design and Discovery: Enzyme Reprogramming
February 2013
Design and Discovery: Extreme Red Shift
February 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Designer Proteins
February 2013
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
Serum albumin diversity
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
Finding function for enolases
June 2012
Substrate specificity sleuths
April 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Making invisible proteins visible
October 2011
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Extremely salty
February 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
How does Dali work?
December 2009
Secretagogin
December 2009
Designing activity
September 2008

Research Themes Protein design

Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2012.112]
Featured Article - December 2012
Short description: Substrate specificity in trypanosomal sphingolipid synthases can be determined by variation in as few as three residues.

Predicted topology of trypanosomatid sphingolipid synthases showing the positions of active site HDD motif and loops providing specificity determinants. Figure courtesy of Brian Fox.

Sphingolipids are essential components of eukaryotic cell membranes and have key roles in protein sorting and signaling, in secondary metabolism, and as precursors in lipid biosynthesis. Sphingolipidoses such as Gaucher and Tay-Sachs diseases are lipid storage disorders that are often fatal during infancy. Furthermore, as protozoan parasites rely on lipid-anchored molecules for protection and infectivity, the interplay with host lipid biosynthesis and metabolism may present an avenue for drug discovery.

Goren, Bangs and Fox (PSI TMPC) have investigated four sphingolipid synthases (TbSLSs) from Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of sleeping sickness. TbSLSs are transmembrane enzymes that transfer a phosphoryl headgroup from phospholipid substrates to ceramide to generate sphingolipids. TbSLSs are predicted to contain six transmembrane helices with an arrangement of histidine and aspartic acid residues in loops 3 and 5 composing a HHD motif proposed to be the catalytic triad. Since this set of four TbSLS paralogs produces sphingolipids with the full range of headgroup structures, while also maintaining >90% sequence identity, the observed specificity may be due to a limited number of residues.

As with many membrane proteins, TbSLSs present challenges in generating functional samples. The authors employed their recently developed cell-free translation methods to successfully express and incorporate all four TbSLSs into proteoliposomes for thin-layer chromatography activity assays.

Point mutants of the three HHD residues in TbSLS1 and TbSLS4 confirmed that each of these residues is essential. Noting that the majority of residue differences are adjacent to the HHD triad, the authors examined additional mutants to delineate residues that are responsible for discriminating between the charge and size of different headgroups. Alignment of non-conserved residues in loops 3 and 5 highlighted two candidates. Asp172 in loop 3 is the only negatively charged variant, while the only loop 5 variant, at position 252, is present as either a Phe or Ser. Reciprocal V172D S252F and D172V F252S double mutants of TbSLS1 and TbSLS3, respectively, converted TbSLS1's specificity from anionic to zwitterionic headgroups and likewise exchanged TbSLS3's specificity from zwitterionic to anionic. Probing for determinants of zwitterionic headgroup size selectivity further revealed that the N170A mutation allowed TbSLS2 to accept a smaller headgroup while the A170N N187D double mutation reciprocally allowed TbSLS4 to accept a larger headgroup.

Overall, the experiments reveal that specificity in TbSLS enzymes can be achieved by a remarkably small number of residues and allowed the authors to propose a catalytic mechanism for TbSLS3 and predict the specificity of other trypanosomal SLS enzymes.

Michael A. Durney

References

  1. M.A. Goren, B.G. Fox, J.D. Bangs. Amino acid determinants of substrate selectivity in the Trypanosoma brucei sphingolipid synthase family.
    Biochemistry. 50, 8853-8861 (2011). doi:10.1021/bi200981a

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health