PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Channels and Transporters: BEST in Show
April 2015
Channels and Transporters: Reorienting a Peptide in the Pocket
April 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Refolding in Membrane Mimetic
March 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: A Cap on Transport
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Pumping Out Heavy Metal
April 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: A Funnel-like Viroporin
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Unveiling the Human α-helical Membrane Proteome
August 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Nanoparticles in Cell Camouflage
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Tuning Membrane Protein Expression
December 2012
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Building a Carrier
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Overexpressed problems
February 2012
Gentle membrane protein extraction
January 2012
Docking and rolling
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
Sugar transport
June 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
TrkH Potassium Ion Transporter
April 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Formate transporter or channel?
March 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins
January 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Surviving in an acid environment
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
You look familiar: the Type VI secretion system
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
Death clusters
March 2009
Protein nanopores
March 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
A pocket guide to GPCRs
December 2008
Tuning membrane protein overexpression
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Membrane proteins

Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2012.114]
Technical Highlight - December 2012
Short description: A novel method for processing non-uniformly sampled NMR data is orders of magnitude faster and permits very sparse sampling for challenging applications.

Outline of the IST procedure for processing NMR data containing signals of varying intensities. Figure courtesy of Gerhard Wagner and Sven Hyberts.

NMR spectroscopy can now tackle many challenging systems, including protein-protein complexes, nucleic acids, and membrane proteins. Such applications have relied on the development of higher magnetic field strengths and the resolution and sensitivity provided by these instruments. The sampling requirements at higher magnetic fields, however, have a drawback: optimal resolution cannot be achieved with current experimental schemes since, for typical measurement times, more data points would be required to fully characterize the range of frequencies in the spectrum. This is particularly evident in higher dimensional 3D and 4D data.

These developments have led to a renewed interest in non-uniform sampling (NUS) methods. In contrast to uniform sampling, NUS sparsely samples data points and, in principle, promises to deliver optimal resolution in a fraction of the time while using instruments to full potential. Whereas data processing for regular sampling schedules uses a simple Fourier transformation (FT), NUS data reconstruction typically requires alternative, and computationally intensive, digital signal processing methods.

Wagner and colleagues (PSI MPSbyNMR) have developed an algorithm based on iterative soft thresholding (IST), an approach previously used to reconstruct signals from the noisy data of MRI and other imaging methods. Using a Poisson-gap sampling scheme, the authors found that IST can be used in conjunction with iterative FT to gradually extract the signal from noise-like artifacts resulting from NUS. Their scheme, implemented in a convenient graphical user interface (GUI), has the significant advantage of using FT, dramatically reducing processing times.

The authors applied their method to several data sets, including a 4D spectrum of a 28 kDa protein-protein complex. The 4D spectrum was acquired with a sampling density of 14.5% and processed orders of magnitude faster, revealing many methyl-methyl interactions. A further experiment aimed at achieving fully optimal resolution using the same 4D experiment sampled at only 0.8% reproduced known assignments. An important requirement for any processing method is the faithful reproduction of relative signal intensities used to generate distance restraints for structure calculations. A comparison of intensities in two IST-processed spectra with equivalent uniformly sampled data demonstrated excellent fidelity in relative peak intensities.

The IST method will be particularly beneficial for α-helical membrane proteins where methyl-methyl contacts provide invaluable structural data. Combined with the convenient GUI and fast processing times, the IST method promises to be widely adopted.

Michael A. Durney

References

  1. S. G. Hyberts et al. Application of iterative soft thresholding for fast reconstruction of NMR data non-uniformly sampled with multidimensional Poisson gap scheduling.
    J Biomol NMR. 52, 315-327 (2012). doi:10.1007/s10858-012-9611-z

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health