PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein

SBKB [doi:10.3942/psi_sgkb/fm_2011_6]
Featured System - June 2011
Short description: Molecular recognition is at the very heart of life.

Molecular recognition is at the very heart of life. Genetic information is transmitted through the specific interaction of bases. Using an array of specific contacts, enzymes force molecules into the conformation needed to catalyze a reaction. Receptors recognize hormones, viruses recognize receptors, and antibodies recognize viruses. Structural biology has revealed the atomic basis of this specificity, showing the many biological tricks-of-the-trade used in molecular interaction.

Periplasmic Binding Proteins

Periplasmic binding proteins have a specific job. They float around in the space between the two membranes surrounding a bacterial cell, searching for a particular type of molecule. When they find one, they capture it and deliver it to transporters at the inner membrane. Some search for ions, others for vitamins, and others for nutrients and food molecules. The one shown here, solved by researchers at NYSGXRC and available in PDB entry 3KSM, binds to ribose sugars. Like many of this class of protein, it is composed of two domains connected by a flexible linker, which traps the sugar inside.

Trapping Molecules

The two-domain structure of the protein is perfect for its job. Since the sugar is trapped inside, the protein can examine it from all sides. This is particularly important for sugars, since they are bristling with hydroxyl groups, and many different sugars look much the same. The two-domain structure is also good for the delivery of its cargo. When the protein has captured a sugar, the transporter recognizes its closed structure. Then, the transporter can pry it open to release the sugar.

Sugar Specificity

Ribofuranosyl binding protein uses several tricks to recognize its target sugar. First of all, it has an array of hydrogen-bonding groups to grip the many hydroxyl groups of the sugar. It also has two aromatic amino acids that contact regions of the sugar where carbon atoms are exposed. The crystal structure revealed that this protein favors an unusual conformation of the ribose ring. Click on the image here to see an interactive Jmol that explores this unusual interaction and how it is recognized.

The JSmol tab below displays an interactive JSmol

Retinoblastoma Protein Pocket Domain (PDB entry 1gux)

Rb binds to many of its partners using a specific pocket that recognizes the motif LxCxE. The central domain of Rb is included in this structure, shown here in blue, with a short peptide bound in this pocket, with the backbone in green and the leucine-cysteine-glutamate in atomic colors. Use the buttons to switch the representation, and to get a close-up view of the pocket.

References

  1. Bagaria, A., Kumaran, D., Burley, S.K. & Swaminathan, S. Structural basis for a ribofuranosyl binding protein: insights into the furanose specific transport. Proteins 79, 1352-1357 (2011)

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health