PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Bespoke Design of Repeat Proteins
June 2015
Design and Evolution: Molecular Sleuthing Reveals Drug Selectivity
June 2015
Design and Evolution: Tunable Antibody Binders
June 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Evolution of Photoconversion
June 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: A TRiC-ster that Follows the Rules
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Beneficial Aggregation
March 2015
Peptidyl-carrier Proteins
October 2014
Predicting Protein Crystal Candidates
October 2014
Protein and Peptide Synthesis: Coming Full Circle
October 2014
Protein and Peptide Synthesis: Sensing Energy Balance
October 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Polysaccharide Metabolism in the Human Gut
May 2014
Design and Discovery: Evolutionary Dynamics
January 2014
Design and Discovery: Identifying New Enzymes and Metabolic Pathways
January 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
Caught in the Act
December 2013
Microbiome: Insights into Secondary Bile Acid Synthesis
September 2013
Microbiome: Structures from Lactic Acid Bacteria
September 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Design and Discovery: A Cocktail for Proteins Without ID
February 2013
Design and Discovery: Enzyme Reprogramming
February 2013
Design and Discovery: Extreme Red Shift
February 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Designer Proteins
February 2013
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
Serum albumin diversity
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
Finding function for enolases
June 2012
Substrate specificity sleuths
April 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Making invisible proteins visible
October 2011
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Extremely salty
February 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
How does Dali work?
December 2009
Secretagogin
December 2009
Designing activity
September 2008

Research Themes Protein design

Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2012.125]
Technical Highlight - February 2013
Short description: Protein redesign via backbone perturbations enables efficient expansion of sequence diversity while maintaining fold and thermostability.

An overlay of WT CheA (salmon), the design model (green) and the crystal structure of the designed protein (cyan) show precise remodeling of side chain packing and loop placement. Figure courtesy of Brian Kuhlman.

Most protein design algorithms are based on sidechain optimization rather than backbone changes, and often return sequences that are highly similar to that of the parent protein, limiting the diversity of sequence space explored. Kuhlman and colleagues now demonstrate that through flexible backbone protein design, the entire hydrophobic core of the CheA phosphotransferase — consisting of 38 residues — can be redesigned while maintaining its four-helix bundle fold. There was a considerable increase in thermostability, as reflected by the Tm of 142°C for the redesigned protein, compared with 91°C for wild-type CheA. The redesigned sequence shared no sequence identity with the core of the parent protein.

In defining the optimal sequence, the authors compared fixed backbone protocols with flexible backbone designs using Rosetta software. Sequences were scored based on the total Rosetta energy score, quality of packing, correct prediction of secondary structure, performance in ab initio folding experiments and deviation from wild-type sequence. The flexible backbone algorithms returned the most divergent sequences and outperformed fixed backbone procedures.

The authors then experimentally validated the top-scoring sequence by structure determination via NMR and X-ray crystallography. The structures were in close agreement with the in silico model (with an all-atom root mean squared deviation of 1.3 Å), confirming that only small-scale backbone perturbations (1–2 Å) were needed for the redesign. There was no simple correlation between the number of buried hydrophobic residues and changes in protein stability, and thus the remarkable thermostability of the redesigned CheA core remains unexplained. Previous studies have observed an increase in side-chain motion in redesigned proteins, presumably due to imperfect packing. These studies have not yet been performed for redesigned CheA. It will be interesting to see if it is more rigid or flexible than the wild-type protein.

Overall, flexible backbone redesign appears promising for enzyme stabilization and the redesign of ligand-binding proteins and protein-protein interfaces, during which certain residues can be constrained to specific conformations. The remaining protein can sample a wide sequence space without altering the desired three-dimensional fold or decreasing thermostability.

Alexandra M. Deaconescu

References

  1. G.S. Murphy et al. Increasing sequence diversity with flexible backbone protein design: the complete redesign of a protein hydrophobic core.
    Structure. 20, 1086-96 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.03.026

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health