PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Molecular Portraits of the Cell
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Updating ModBase
January 2015
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Cancer Networks: Predicting Catalytic Residues from 3D Protein Structures
November 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Infectious Diseases: Targeting Meningitis
May 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Refining protein structure prediction
March 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Devil is in the details
January 2012
Playing while you work
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Fit to serve
October 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Structure from sequence
July 2011
An easier solution for symmetry
June 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Modeling RNA structures
May 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Network coverage
November 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Protein modeling made easy
July 2009
Model proteins in your lunch break
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008
Modeling with SAXS
October 2008
Designing activity
September 2008

Technology Topics Modeling

Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2012.125]
Technical Highlight - February 2013
Short description: Protein redesign via backbone perturbations enables efficient expansion of sequence diversity while maintaining fold and thermostability.

An overlay of WT CheA (salmon), the design model (green) and the crystal structure of the designed protein (cyan) show precise remodeling of side chain packing and loop placement. Figure courtesy of Brian Kuhlman.

Most protein design algorithms are based on sidechain optimization rather than backbone changes, and often return sequences that are highly similar to that of the parent protein, limiting the diversity of sequence space explored. Kuhlman and colleagues now demonstrate that through flexible backbone protein design, the entire hydrophobic core of the CheA phosphotransferase — consisting of 38 residues — can be redesigned while maintaining its four-helix bundle fold. There was a considerable increase in thermostability, as reflected by the Tm of 142°C for the redesigned protein, compared with 91°C for wild-type CheA. The redesigned sequence shared no sequence identity with the core of the parent protein.

In defining the optimal sequence, the authors compared fixed backbone protocols with flexible backbone designs using Rosetta software. Sequences were scored based on the total Rosetta energy score, quality of packing, correct prediction of secondary structure, performance in ab initio folding experiments and deviation from wild-type sequence. The flexible backbone algorithms returned the most divergent sequences and outperformed fixed backbone procedures.

The authors then experimentally validated the top-scoring sequence by structure determination via NMR and X-ray crystallography. The structures were in close agreement with the in silico model (with an all-atom root mean squared deviation of 1.3 Å), confirming that only small-scale backbone perturbations (1–2 Å) were needed for the redesign. There was no simple correlation between the number of buried hydrophobic residues and changes in protein stability, and thus the remarkable thermostability of the redesigned CheA core remains unexplained. Previous studies have observed an increase in side-chain motion in redesigned proteins, presumably due to imperfect packing. These studies have not yet been performed for redesigned CheA. It will be interesting to see if it is more rigid or flexible than the wild-type protein.

Overall, flexible backbone redesign appears promising for enzyme stabilization and the redesign of ligand-binding proteins and protein-protein interfaces, during which certain residues can be constrained to specific conformations. The remaining protein can sample a wide sequence space without altering the desired three-dimensional fold or decreasing thermostability.

Alexandra M. Deaconescu

References

  1. G.S. Murphy et al. Increasing sequence diversity with flexible backbone protein design: the complete redesign of a protein hydrophobic core.
    Structure. 20, 1086-96 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.str.2012.03.026

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health