PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Channels and Transporters: BEST in Show
April 2015
Channels and Transporters: Reorienting a Peptide in the Pocket
April 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Refolding in Membrane Mimetic
March 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: A Cap on Transport
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Pumping Out Heavy Metal
April 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: A Funnel-like Viroporin
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Unveiling the Human α-helical Membrane Proteome
August 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Nanoparticles in Cell Camouflage
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Tuning Membrane Protein Expression
December 2012
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Building a Carrier
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Overexpressed problems
February 2012
Gentle membrane protein extraction
January 2012
Docking and rolling
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
Sugar transport
June 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
TrkH Potassium Ion Transporter
April 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Formate transporter or channel?
March 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins
January 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Surviving in an acid environment
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
You look familiar: the Type VI secretion system
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
Death clusters
March 2009
Protein nanopores
March 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
A pocket guide to GPCRs
December 2008
Tuning membrane protein overexpression
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Membrane proteins

Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2012.130]
Technical Highlight - March 2013
Short description: Structure determination of a membrane protein using poorly diffracting microcrystals illustrates a powerful new application of solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Alternate views of the YadA-M structure ensemble determined by MAS solid-state NMR using microcrystals. 1

Membrane protein structure determination faces many difficulties, including formation of well-diffracting crystals from detergent-purified samples. Solution-state NMR experiments are also challenging due to the large size of protein-detergent assemblies, leading to poor data sensitivity and resolution. Solid-state NMR (ssNMR) spectroscopy has unique capabilities and can yield both structural and dynamic information from samples oriented in media, such as lipid bilayers. Compared to solution NMR, the major advantage of ssNMR is that it is not limited by molecular weight. Moreover, magic angle spinning (MAS) of samples averages anisotropic interactions between nuclei, resulting in increased resolution.

Habeck, Linke, van Rossum and colleagues have now developed a novel application of MAS ssNMR using the bacterial integral membrane protein YadA as a test case. A member of the trimeric autotransporter adhesin (TAA) family, YadA is used by the pathogen Y enterocolitica to adhere to host cells during infection. Microcrystals of the YadA membrane anchor region (YadA-M) were obtained during crystallization trials but were not of sufficient quality to solve the structure. The authors decided instead to use the microcrystals for ssNMR experiments and obtained a comprehensive data set from a single sample. Although 24 MAS experiments were recorded, 13 of those provided the necessary structural information due to the high quality of the data. The chemical shift data and distance restraints revealed that the YadA-M structure is composed of an N-terminal α-helix and four β-strands.

The actual structure determination did pose challenges, given that some ssNMR restraint types are less tightly defined than those in solution. In addition, as with other proteins that form homo-oligomers, there is considerable ambiguity associated with resolving intra- and inter-monomer interactions. The authors addressed this issue via an iterative approach, using the inferential structure determination method previously applied to sparse and hybrid data sets. The final calculations were only compatible with a trimer and the structure ensemble is well defined, with an r.m.s.d. of 0.84 ± 0.32 Å for Cα atoms.

The trimeric YadA-M structure consists of a β-barrel and a coiled-coil composed of the N-terminal α-helices that pass through the central cavity. Evolutionary analysis of TAA family members supports the observation from the NMR data that residues in the barrel lumen and an adjacent ASSA sequence present structural flexibility. The structure also allowed the authors to propose an intermediate involving the ASSA sequence during the autotransport mechanism.

Michael A. Durney

References

  1. S.A. Shahid et al. Membrane-protein structure determination by solid-state NMR spectroscopy of microcrystals.
    Nat Methods. 9, 1212-1217 (2012). doi:10.1038/nmeth.2248

  2. S.A. Shahid, S. Markovic, D. Linke, B.J. van Rossum. Assignment and secondary structure of the YadA membrane protein by solid-state MAS NMR.
    Sci Rep. 2, 803 (2012). doi:10.1038/srep00803

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health