PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Molecular Portraits of the Cell
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Updating ModBase
January 2015
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Cancer Networks: Predicting Catalytic Residues from 3D Protein Structures
November 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Infectious Diseases: Targeting Meningitis
May 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Refining protein structure prediction
March 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Devil is in the details
January 2012
Playing while you work
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Fit to serve
October 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Structure from sequence
July 2011
An easier solution for symmetry
June 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Modeling RNA structures
May 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Network coverage
November 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Protein modeling made easy
July 2009
Model proteins in your lunch break
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008
Modeling with SAXS
October 2008
Designing activity
September 2008

Technology Topics Modeling

Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2012.135]
Technical Highlight - April 2013
Short description: Interactome3D is a tool and resource for annotating protein networks with three-dimensional structure information.

With Interactome3D's homology modeling pipeline, protein networks can be annotated with three-dimensional structural models of protein interactions. 2

Proteins are the workhorses of the cell, carrying out their biological functions in highly coordinated interaction networks. A protein network can be visually represented as a graph, where nodes represent proteins and edges represent the interactions. High-throughput technologies have generated a large amount of information about these networks in a variety of organisms. But those data do not offer insight into the molecular details of protein-protein interactions, which is essential in understanding the function of protein networks.

Aloy and colleagues present Interactome3D, a web tool providing an automated pipeline for modeling protein-protein interactions at atomic resolution in three dimensions.The tool helps highlight the regions of a protein involved in binding to another protein partner. Interactome3D also serves as a resource, offering precalculated models for 12,000 protein-protein interactions in eight model organisms.

The PDB hosts a large and ever-growing number of structures of individual proteins, but structures of protein complexes are still sorely underrepresented. Solving the structures of protein complexes at atomic resolution remains technically challenging, so Interactome3D's modeling pipeline can help pick up where experimental data taper off.

The user-friendly interface of Interactome3D offers a fully automated homology modeling pipeline, so researchers need only input their interaction network of interest for structural annotation. The homology modeling pipeline first collects structural information from the PDB and from high-quality homology models for each protein in the network. Next, experimentally determined structures for each interaction or suitable modeling templates are selected. The templates are then evaluated using a scoring function, and the best of these are used to build the models. Finally, the models are evaluated for completeness and quality.

The authors illustrated the value of Interactome3D by structurally annotating the complement cascade pathway of the innate immune system. They obtained nearly complete structural annotation of this network, allowing them to account for the effects of disease-causing mutations and highlighting interfaces that could be targeted with small molecules to mitigate those effects.

The team has calculated that Interactome3D should be able to provide structural details for an additional 16,000 yet-to-be-discovered interactions, and, with every structure deposited in the PDB, the quality of structural annotation will grow.

Allison Doerr

References

  1. R. Mosca et al. Interactome3D: adding structural details to protein networks.
    Nat. Methods 10, 47-53 (2013). doi:10.1038/nmeth.2289

  2. J. Teyra & P.M. Kim Interpreting protein networks with three-dimensional structures.
    Nat. Methods 10, 43-44 (2013). doi:10.1038/nmeth.2300

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health