PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2012.148]
Featured Article - July 2013
Short description: A cyanobacterial transcription factor recognizes three consecutive cytosines in promoter DNA using a single glutamate residue.

Ribbon diagram of sequence-specific recognition in the HetR-DNA complex detailing how Glu71 interacts with three consecutive cytosines. Protein and DNA are colored blue and green, respectively. Figure courtesy of Andrzej Joachimiak.

Nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria respond to the absence of nitrogen by differentiating specialized cells called heterocysts, in a process regulated by the HetR transcription factor. Joachimiak, Haselkorn and colleagues (PSI MCSG) have solved structures of HetR bound to various DNA target sequences. The 2.50-Å structure of dimeric HetR in complex with a consensus sequence containing distinctive triplets of guanine-cytosine (GC) base pairs (PDB 3QOD) reveals the structural basis of sequence-specific recognition. Compared to HetR in its free state, HetR in this complex is more ordered and symmetric, while the DNA is bent by ∼30° following the curved, positively-charged protein surface. While many direct and solvent-mediated interactions are observed, the main specific binding determinants are contained in the two helix-turn-helix (HTH) motifs that insert symmetrically into the DNA major groove.

Among the many interactions observed were several phosphate contacts on both strands that fix the register of DNA binding; for example α-helix dipole interactions for the three α-helices, exemplified by helix H4 in the major groove, where the positively-charged N-terminus interacts with a phosphate and helical residues engage in backbone and specific side-chain interactions with both protein and DNA. In addition, a unique pattern of base-specific interactions in the major groove is observed for three strictly conserved HTH residues. Strikingly, a glutamate (Glu71) in the turn forms hydrogen bonds with three consecutive cytosines in the GC base pair triplets; a lysine and an arginine make additional interactions with adenine and guanine bases. The two arms of the DNA palindrome show slightly different interactions, suggesting that the structure captures the complex in two states: one in which all contacts are formed and a binding intermediate in which selected water-mediated contacts are present.

Remarkably, substitution of Glu71 with arginine, glutamine or asparagine completely abolishes binding and heterocyst differentiation in vivo, as measured by a complementation assay. Furthermore, structures with longer DNA duplexes revealed possible roles for a flap domain in binding, in addition to a HetR tetramer bound to two duplexes. Since HetR regulates multiple loci, the authors suggest that the tetramer may have a role in coordinated gene expression.

Michael A. Durney

References

  1. Y Kim et al. Structures of complexes comprised of Fischerella transcription factor HetR with Anabena DNA targets.
    PNAS. 110, E1716-E1723 (2013). doi:10.1073/pnas.1305971110

  2. Y Kim et al. Structure of transcription factor HetR required for heterocyst differentiation in cyanobacteria.
    PNAS. 108, 10109-10114 doi:10.1073/pnas.1106840108

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health