PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex

SBKB [doi:10.3942/psi_sgkb/fm_2012_3]
Featured System - March 2012
Short description: This is an exciting time for the study of the nuclear pore complex, the highway of transport between the cytoplasm and nucleus, and also a central player in nuclear organization and gene regulation.

This is an exciting time for the study of the nuclear pore complex, the highway of transport between the cytoplasm and nucleus, and also a central player in nuclear organization and gene regulation. Decades of electron micrographic work are now being combined with atomic structures to reveal the inner workings of this huge protein complex. With the help of PSI member NYSGRC, researchers have built comprehensive maps that bring together diverse data on the nuclear pore complex: proteomics studies provide a recipe of components; biophysical studies, such as sedimentation analysis and affinity purification, can reveal the shape of individual nucleoporin proteins and their interactions; and electron microscopy provides the overall ultrastructure, which when combined with specific antibodies provides the localization of proteins.

Symmetrical Structure

The map reveals a modular structure, built in several layers from 456 protein chains. In the middle, a ring of three types of proteins surrounds the central channel filled with tangled chains that guide cargo transport through the nuclear pore complex. This ring is anchored to the membrane by a complex scaffolding of proteins. Attached to this scaffold, a complex basket controls the flow of molecules on the nuclear side and long filaments guide molecules on the cytoplasmic side (not shown in the diagram). Surprisingly, the whole thing, one of the largest protein structures in the cell, is constructed of only about 30 types of proteins, but with many copies of each type.

Sequence Similarities

By analysis of the sequences of these nucleoporin proteins, researchers predicted that they actually share many common features, which were later confirmed by high-resolution analyses. Almost all fall into three classes: extended girders composed of many stacked alpha helices, small disk-shaped proteins composed of a propeller arrangement of beta sheets, and a specialized protein sequence that doesn't fold into any shape at all. The alpha helical proteins and propellers are sturdy folds for building the infrastructure of the nuclear pore complex. The unstructured chains, on the other hand, are perfect for displaying short recognition sequences that capture transport proteins and guide them through the central channel.

Nucleoporin Structures

As with many other complex biological structures, researchers are studying the structure of the nuclear pore complex by breaking it into parts. One large structural building block is shown here, termed the Nup84 complex, which assembles to form a ring that shapes the nuclear pore complex. It is particularly stable and amenable to study. The overall structure has been determined by electron microscopy, and many of the individual components have been studied by x-ray crystallography. Several structures are shown here, from PDB entries 3iko, 3ewe, 3f7f, 3kfo, 3kep, 3kfo, 1xip, 3i5p, 3nf5 and 2aiv. The proteins are colored to highlight the types of domains: the alpha-helical domains are in blue, and the propellers are in green. Researchers have also begun to map specific functions to particular parts of this complex, for instance, the two short arms seem to be particularly important for connecting this complex to the rest of the nuclear pore complex.

Structural Similarities

By looking at the sequences and structures of nucleoporins, researchers working with NYSGRC have discovered a similarity with other structural proteins. In particular, several of the scaffolding nucleoporins are very similiar to proteins that form geodesic coats around vesicles, such as clathrin, CopI and CopII, suggesting that these systems evolved from a similar ancestor. This makes sense because the alpha-helical fold is highly modular, and can be modified through gene duplication to form a variety of structures with different lengths. To compare the structure of a CopII protein and several nucleoporins, the JSmol tab below displays an interactive JSmol.

Sec31 and Nucleoporins (PDB entries 2pm6, 2qx5, 3f3f, and 3iko)

Sec31 protein from CopII and several nucleoporins share a common folding motif composed of many stacked alpha helices. When looking at these proteins, notice that the core structure is similar, forming a rod-shaped infrastructure, which is then decorated with loops and tails that interact with their different partners. Use the buttons to view the different proteins and change the representation.

References

  1. Devos, D., et al. Simple fold composition and modular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2172-2177 (2006).

  2. Alber, F., et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450, 695-701 (2007).

  3. Brohawn, S. G., Partridge, J. R., Whittle, J. R. R. & Schwartz, T. U. The nuclear pore complex has entered the atomic age. Structure 17, 1156-1168 (2009).

  4. Hoelz, A., Debler, E. W. & Blobel, G. The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 80, 613-643 (2011).

  5. Fernandez-Martinez, J., et al. Structure-function mapping of a heptameric module in the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell. Biol. in press.

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health