PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons

Related Articles
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Molecular Portraits of the Cell
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Updating ModBase
January 2015
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Cancer Networks: Predicting Catalytic Residues from 3D Protein Structures
November 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Infectious Diseases: Targeting Meningitis
May 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Refining protein structure prediction
March 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Devil is in the details
January 2012
Playing while you work
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Fit to serve
October 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Structure from sequence
July 2011
An easier solution for symmetry
June 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Modeling RNA structures
May 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Network coverage
November 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Protein modeling made easy
July 2009
Model proteins in your lunch break
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008
Modeling with SAXS
October 2008
Designing activity
September 2008

Technology Topics Modeling

Transmembrane Spans

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2014.235]
Technical Highlight - December 2014
Short description: Analyses of nine topology prediction programs identify those with the greatest prediction accuracy for specific transmembrane transport protein families, and lead the authors to propose several distinguishable evolutionary pathways for these proteins.

Proposed pathway for evolution of channel proteins and small-molecule transporters. Figure reproduced with permission from ref. 1, Copyright © 2014, Karger Publishers, Basel, Switzerland.

Many topological prediction programs have been developed for analysis of the structurally diverse integral membrane channel and carrier proteins found universally in all living organisms. The simplest of these proteins contain just one or two transmembrane segments and form non-specific oligomeric channels, whereas others span the membrane many times and function without oligomerization. The former are believed to be the evolutionary precursors of the latter. Saier and colleagues (PSI TransportPDB) compared the accuracy of nine topology prediction programs on various families of membrane transport proteins.

In an initial analysis of four families, HMMTOP, SPOCTOPUS and MEMSAT yielded best predictions, with the other six programs showing inferior performance. The authors combined these three algorithms into a new program, TMStats, and used this novel program to analyze a broad range of integral membrane transport protein types. They detailed their results according to protein family for each of the channel and carrier types analyzed.

Even the best programs underperformed in analyses of several protein families, and the causes of these errors were often family-specific. In some cases, systematic mistakes were identified, some but not others of which occurred using multiple programs. Predictions for families containing proteins that can exist in both membrane-integrated and soluble forms were especially challenging, particularly since structures of the membrane-integrated forms were often not available. The authors proposed introducing family-specific prediction algorithms, all combined into a single program with the capacity to determine which settings to use for a given query family.

Based on these analyses, the authors put forth evolutionary pathways for the appearance of different types of channels and secondary carriers. As noted above, they suggested that these evolved multiple times, starting from small oligomeric channel-forming peptides, via repeated intragenic duplication events. This was presumed to be followed by subsequent acquisition of mutations to confer substrate specificity and transport-related conformational transitions that converted channels into carriers.

Irene Kaganman


  1. A. Reddy et al. Reliability of nine programs of topological predictions and their application to integral membrane channel and carrier proteins.
    J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, 161-190 (2014). doi:10.1159/000363506

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health