PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Channels and Transporters: BEST in Show
April 2015
Channels and Transporters: Reorienting a Peptide in the Pocket
April 2015
Ryanodine Receptor
April 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Refolding in Membrane Mimetic
March 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Glucagon Receptor
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: A Cap on Transport
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Microcrystals Yield Big Data
April 2014
Membrane Proteome: Pumping Out Heavy Metal
April 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
G Proteins and Cancer
November 2013
Drug Discovery: Antidepressant Potential of 6-NQ SERT Inhibitors
October 2013
Drug Discovery: Modeling NET Interactions
October 2013
Microbiome: Solid-State NMR, Crystallized
September 2013
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: A Funnel-like Viroporin
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: GPCR Substrate Recognition and Functional Selectivity
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Making DNA Nanotubes for NMR Structure Determination
August 2013
Membrane Proteome: Unveiling the Human α-helical Membrane Proteome
August 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Nanoparticles in Cell Camouflage
March 2013
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Soft Sampling
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Tuning Membrane Protein Expression
December 2012
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Building a Carrier
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Every Protein Has Its Tag
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: Specific vs. Non-specific weak interactions
November 2012
Membrane Proteome: The ABCs of Transport
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Insert Here
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
To structure, faster
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Overexpressed problems
February 2012
Gentle membrane protein extraction
January 2012
Docking and rolling
October 2011
A fragmented approach to membrane protein structures
September 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
Sugar transport
June 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
TrkH Potassium Ion Transporter
April 2011
Subtly different
March 2011
A new amphiphile for crystallizing membrane proteins
January 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
ABA receptor diversity
November 2010
COX inhibition: Naproxen by proxy
November 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Formate transporter or channel?
March 2010
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Five good reasons to use single protein production for membrane proteins
January 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Surviving in an acid environment
August 2009
Tips for crystallizing membrane proteins
June 2009
You look familiar: the Type VI secretion system
June 2009
Bacterial Leucine Transporter, LeuT
May 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
Death clusters
March 2009
Protein nanopores
March 2009
Transporter mechanism in sight
February 2009
A pocket guide to GPCRs
December 2008
Tuning membrane protein overexpression
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008

Research Themes Membrane proteins

Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2014.243]
Featured Article - February 2015
Short description: Structural flexibility in HEAT motifs enables proteins to pass through the nuclear pore complex.

Structures of importin β from MD simulations in water (a) and 50% [v/v] tetrafluoroethylene/water (b), showing changes in distances between helices. Reproduced from 1, Copyright 2014, with permission from Elsevier.

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) allows proteins to travel between the cytoplasm and nucleus. Small proteins (<40 kDa) can pass through the central channel of the NPC via passive transport, whereas larger proteins require the help of transport receptors. Yoshimura and colleagues recently demonstrated how structural flexibility within transport receptors allows them to chaperone large proteins across the NPC.

One common group of transport receptors, karyopherin β, contains a series of HEAT repeats, each consisting of two amphiphilic α-helices connected by a short linker. The authors used an in vitro transport assay and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to show that karyopherins, as well as several other HEAT-rich proteins, could pass through the NPC, even though they exceeded the size limit. Karyopherins could also bind to and transport cargo proteins, otherwise excluded from the nucleus, across the NPC. The ability of HEAT-rich proteins to pass through the NPC was attributed to structural dynamics within the motif. Restraining the conformational flexibility of HEAT-rich proteins via a covalently attached crosslinker reduced their ability to traverse the NPC.

To mimic how HEAT motifs act in a hydrophobic environment such as the inside of the NPC channel, the authors studied the effects of hydrophobic solvents on the structure of HEAT-rich proteins. Circular dichroism and fluorescence spectroscopy revealed reversible changes in the tertiary but not secondary structure of HEAT-rich proteins in the presence of hydrophobic solvents. The effect on the tertiary structure was greater as the length of the alkyl group of the solvent increased.

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the HEAT-rich karyopherin importin β provided an explanation for these structural changes: in a hydrophobic solvent, the helices were more spread out, and more hydrophobic residues were exposed to the solvent. Similar results were observed when MD simulations were performed on a complex of importin β with a cargo protein.

This study shows that the structural flexibility afforded by HEAT motifs enables several proteins to pass through the NPC and to carry cargo proteins, despite their large size. This property may be expanded to proteins with other flexible repetitive amphiphilic structural elements.

Jennifer Cable

References

  1. S.H. Yoshimura, M. Kumeta and S.H. Takeyasu Structural mechanism of nuclear transport mediated by importin β and flexible amphiphilic proteins.
    Structure 22, 1699-1710 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.str.2014.10.009

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health