PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
CAAX Endoproteases
August 2013
The Immune System: A Strong Competitor
June 2013
The Immune System: Strand Swapping for T-Cell Inhibition
June 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Morph to Assemble
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Reading Between the Lines
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: When the Sum Is Greater than the Parts
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cytochrome Oxidase
November 2012
Bacterial Phosphotransferase System
October 2012
Solute Channels
September 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
G Protein-Coupled Receptors
May 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Anchoring's the way
February 2012
Reading out regioselectivity
December 2011
An effective and cooperative dimer
November 2011
PDZ domains: sometimes it takes two
November 2011
Raising a glass to GLIC
August 2011
A2A Adenosine Receptor
May 2011
A growing family
February 2011
FERM-ly bound
February 2011
CXCR4
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Zinc Transporter ZntB
July 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Spot protein-protein interactions… fast
March 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Urea transporter
February 2010
Two-component signaling
December 2009
ABA receptor...this time for real?
November 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Get3 into the groove
October 2009
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Vav1 and Rho GTPase Rac1
October 2009
GPCR subunits: Separate but not equal
September 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008

Research Themes Protein-protein interactions

Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2014.244]
Technical Highlight - February 2015
Short description: Integrating mass spectrometry data for crosslinked oligomers reveals details of the yeast nuclear pore complex.

DSS (green) and EDC (red) crosslinks provided complementary spatial information in the analysis of the Nup84 complex. Figure from ref. 1 , © 2014 The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

When classical structural determination methods fail to provide high-resolution information for large complexes that are often dynamic and flexible, integrative approaches can reveal more details. Available data of various resolutions, obtained using a range of methods, are used to generate spatial restraints, and structures that satisfy these restraints are calculated and analyzed. Chemical crosslinking followed by mass spectrometry (CX-MS) facilitates determination of spatial restraints, and researchers have now improved on the approach by using two complementary crosslinkers.

The Chait, Rout and Sali groups optimized the structural characterization pipeline. Using established methods, they affinity purified the endogenously tagged ∼600 kDa Nup84 complex in a proof-of-principle study. Comprised of seven nucleoporins, the Nup84 complex forms the outer rings of the nuclear pore complex. The authors crosslinked natively purified complexes with disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS), which targets primary amines, and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), which targets more abundant carboxylic groups. After digests, they separated the resulting peptides by size-exclusion chromatography and analyzed them by liquid chromatography-MS; a pLink search identified crosslinks. DSS and EDC crosslinks provided complementary restraints, and the data were mutually confirmatory. The authors suggest that some of the differences could reflect heterogeneity and/or conformational flexibility in the complexes, and disorder previously observed by electron microscopy (EM).

In addition to these experimental data, in the modeling, the researchers integrated restraints based on EM analyses of Nup84, X-ray crystallography data for domains of the complex as well as comparative modeling data. Of the possible configurations, 6,520 models satisfied the restraints, and the researchers clustered and analyzed these solutions to come up with final models. The highest resolution achieved for one region of the complex was 12.7 Å. The reported structure revealed greater detail, particularly in the hub region of the complex, which showed how constituent proteins interact.

Irene Kaganman

References

  1. Y. Shi et al. Structural characterization by crosslinking reveals the detailed architecture of a coatomer-related heptameric module from the nuclear pore complex.
    Mol Cell Proteomics 13, 2927-2943 (2014). doi:10.1074/mcp.M114.041673

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health