PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Molecular Portraits of the Cell
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Updating ModBase
January 2015
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Cancer Networks: Predicting Catalytic Residues from 3D Protein Structures
November 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Infectious Diseases: Targeting Meningitis
May 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Refining protein structure prediction
March 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Devil is in the details
January 2012
Playing while you work
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Fit to serve
October 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Structure from sequence
July 2011
An easier solution for symmetry
June 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Modeling RNA structures
May 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Network coverage
November 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Protein modeling made easy
July 2009
Model proteins in your lunch break
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008
Modeling with SAXS
October 2008
Designing activity
September 2008

Technology Topics Modeling

Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2014.244]
Technical Highlight - February 2015
Short description: Integrating mass spectrometry data for crosslinked oligomers reveals details of the yeast nuclear pore complex.

DSS (green) and EDC (red) crosslinks provided complementary spatial information in the analysis of the Nup84 complex. Figure from ref. 1 , © 2014 The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

When classical structural determination methods fail to provide high-resolution information for large complexes that are often dynamic and flexible, integrative approaches can reveal more details. Available data of various resolutions, obtained using a range of methods, are used to generate spatial restraints, and structures that satisfy these restraints are calculated and analyzed. Chemical crosslinking followed by mass spectrometry (CX-MS) facilitates determination of spatial restraints, and researchers have now improved on the approach by using two complementary crosslinkers.

The Chait, Rout and Sali groups optimized the structural characterization pipeline. Using established methods, they affinity purified the endogenously tagged ∼600 kDa Nup84 complex in a proof-of-principle study. Comprised of seven nucleoporins, the Nup84 complex forms the outer rings of the nuclear pore complex. The authors crosslinked natively purified complexes with disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS), which targets primary amines, and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), which targets more abundant carboxylic groups. After digests, they separated the resulting peptides by size-exclusion chromatography and analyzed them by liquid chromatography-MS; a pLink search identified crosslinks. DSS and EDC crosslinks provided complementary restraints, and the data were mutually confirmatory. The authors suggest that some of the differences could reflect heterogeneity and/or conformational flexibility in the complexes, and disorder previously observed by electron microscopy (EM).

In addition to these experimental data, in the modeling, the researchers integrated restraints based on EM analyses of Nup84, X-ray crystallography data for domains of the complex as well as comparative modeling data. Of the possible configurations, 6,520 models satisfied the restraints, and the researchers clustered and analyzed these solutions to come up with final models. The highest resolution achieved for one region of the complex was 12.7 Å. The reported structure revealed greater detail, particularly in the hub region of the complex, which showed how constituent proteins interact.

Irene Kaganman

References

  1. Y. Shi et al. Structural characterization by crosslinking reveals the detailed architecture of a coatomer-related heptameric module from the nuclear pore complex.
    Mol Cell Proteomics 13, 2927-2943 (2014). doi:10.1074/mcp.M114.041673

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health