PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership

SBKB [doi:10.1038/sbkb.2015.11]
Featured Article - May 2015
Short description: Crystal structures provide a glimpse into how phosphoinositides stabilize nuclear hormones.

Surface representation of human SF-1 LBD bound to bacterial phosphatidylethanol (left) or PIP3 (right), showing the ordering of L2-3 and additional charges presented by the PIP3's fully exposed head group. Figure from ref. 1 .

Phosphoinositides have non-membrane-associated regulatory roles in the nucleus. Yet the exact function of the nuclear pool of these phospholipids remains unclear. Fletterick, Ingraham and colleagues (PSI JCSG and PSI STEMCELL) have shed light on one such role.

Previous work had suggested that phosphoinositides can act as ligands for nuclear receptors, binding to the hydrophobic pocket. To obtain a detailed view of such lipid-protein interactions and explore their biological significance, the authors solved the crystal structures of the lipid-binding domain (LBD) of human nuclear receptor SF-1 (also known as NR5A1) bound to the phosphoinositides PI(3,4,5)P3 (PIP3) (PDB 4QJR) or PI(4,5)P2 (PIP2) (PDB 4QK4). For both complexes, a peptide from coactivator protein PGC1-α was used as a cocrystallization factor.

The choice of phospholipids was dictated by the authors' binding assays, which indicated that among various phosphoinositides, these two species bound to SF-1 LBD with the highest affinity. Consistently, analysis of the melting temperature of SF-1 LBD bound to different phospholipid ligands showed that those two phosphoinositides had the greatest stabilizing effects. PIP3 had the strongest affinity and effect on the stability of SF-1 LBD; it also enhanced the affinity of SF-1 for the coactivator PGC1-α to a greater extent than did PIP2.

Structure-associated analyses revealed that the acyl chains of these phosphoinositides are buried in the hydrophobic, hormone-binding pocket of SF-1, whereas their charged, hydrophilic head group bulges out to be fully exposed to solvent. Moreover, the head groups of PIP3 and PIP2 form an extensive network of interactions with SF-1 loop L2-3 (linking helices H2 and H3) at the entrance of the hormone-binding pocket, stabilizing the loop and preparing SF-1 for association with transcription coregulators. Intriguingly, mutations in two of the loop residues mediating stabilizing interactions had been linked to the loss of function of SF-1 and with pathologies including male infertility, premature ovarian failure and adrenal insufficiency. Thus, this knowledge could guide therapeutic targeting of SF-1 beyond its hydrophobic pocket.

The team's earlier work hinted that PIP3-associated SF-1 is more active than the PIP2-bound version. Yet the two related structures are nearly identical, which may be due to the stabilizing effect of the PGC1-α peptide. The authors propose that PIP3's head group and the stabilized loops of SF-1 together form a docking surface for other nuclear proteins, acting as a regulatory site. Future structures of full-length SF-1 in complex with various phosphoinositides may provide more definitive answers.

Sadaf Shadan

References

  1. R. D. Blind et al. The signaling phospholipid PIP3 creates a new interaction surface on the nuclear receptor SF-1.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111, 15054-9 (2014). doi:10.1073/pnas.1416740111

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health