PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Dynamic DnaK

SBKB [doi:10.3942/psi_sgkb/fm_2015_3]
Featured System - March 2015
Short description: PSI researchers have used an engineered version of DnaK to reveal the open state of an Hsp70 protein chaperone.

Each of our cells contains a complete factory for building proteins, including the machinery for building the component amino acids and for linking them up according to information in the genome. There is also an effective system for quality control, to ensure that these proteins fold in the proper way and are discarded efficiently when their jobs are finished. Many of these quality control proteins are termed "heat shock proteins" (Hsp), because they are made in larger quantities when cells are faced with extreme environmental challenges, like excess heat. These come in many shapes and sizes, and are often named based on their molecular weight, such as Hsp60, Hsp70, and Hsp90.

Hsp70 Chaperones

The Hsp70 class of protein chaperones prevent misfolding and unwanted aggregation by shielding hydrophobic segments while new proteins are folding. Hsp70 chaperones are highly dynamic proteins with many moving parts. At one end, a substrate-binding domain (shown in blue and turquoise) clamps around the target protein, blocking association with other unfolded protein chains. At the other end, a nucleotide-binding domain (shown in green) uses ATP to regulate the process. The two domains are connected by a flexible linker (shown in yellow). The one shown here DnaK, a widely-studied Hsp70 chaperone found in bacteria.

Open and Shut Case

DnaK undergoes a large change in shape as it performs its function. When it is bound to its target proteins, shown at the top here from PDB entry 2kho, the two domains are separated, and the substrate-binding domain is clamped around its target (shown here with magenta dots). When the protein chain is released, DnaK adopts an entirely different conformation, with the substrate binding domain completely open and with all the domains associated in a tighter complex. Two structures have recently revealed this amazing transition: a structure stabilized by disulfides (PDB entry 4b9q) that were engineered based on the structure of a related heat shock protein, Sse1 (PDB entry 2qxl), and a structure from PSI researchers at NYCOMPS stabilized with a small engineered loop (PDB entry 4jne, shown here at the bottom).


Elusive Targets

Because they are so dynamic, Hsp70 chaperones and their partners have been challenging targets for structural study. The open form of DnaK was studied using NMR and spin labeling to define the possible orientations of the two domains, which were studied separately by crystallography. A similar hybrid method was used to explore the dynamics of the Hsp40 cochaperone DnaJ shown here from PDB entry 4j80 (for more information on this protein, see the Featured System on DNAJA1). PSI researchers at MPP have recently reported several studies using NMR to dissect the role of the linker and interaction with cochaperones in an Hsp70 protein that assists the construction of iron-sulfur cluster proteins. These types of studies solve more and more of the complex puzzle of the structure and function of these dynamic proteins.


Open DnaK

The structures of the open form of DnaK capture a key state of this dynamic protein: when it is open and ready to bind to an unfolded protein. A molecule of ATP (red) is bound in the nucleotide-binding domain (green), subtly shifting the shape of the domain and guiding the opening of the substrate-binding domain (blue). Cleavage and release of this ATP, with the assistance of cochaperones like DnaJ, will make the protein ready to bind and protect another folding protein chain. To take a closer look at the domain organization of this open form of DnaK, and the similar chaperone Sse1, the JSmol tab below displays an interactive JSmol.

Open DnaK and Sse1 (PDB entries 4jne and 2qxl)

The structures of DnaK and the distantly-related yeast heat shock protein Sse1 are overlapped in this JSmol, showing their similar conformation in the open, ATP-bound state. The ATP-binding domain is shown in green, with ATP in red, and the two parts of the substrate binding domain are in turquoise and blue. The short linker that connects the ATP-binding domain and the substrate binding domain is shown in yellow. Use the buttons to compare the two structures and to explore different representations.

References

  1. Alderson, T. R. et al. The specialized Hsp70 (HscA) interdomain linker binds to its nucleotide-binding domain and stimulates ATP hydrolysis in both cis and trans configurations. Biochem. 53, 7148-7159 (2014).

  2. Kim, J. H., Alderson, T. R., Frederick, R. O. & Markley, J. L. Nucleotide-dependent interactions within a specialized Hsp70/Hsp40 complex involved in Fe-S cluster biogenesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 11586-11589 (2014).

  3. 4j80: Barends, T. R. M. et al. Combining crystallography and EPR: crystal and solution structures of the multidomain cochaperone DnaJ. Acta Cryst. D69, 1540-1552 (2013).

  4. 4jne: Qi, R. et al. Allosteric opening of the polypeptide-binding site when an Hsp70 binds ATP. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 900-907 (2013).

  5. Saibil, H. Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 630-642 (2013).

  6. 4b9q: Kityk, R., Kopp, J., Sinning, I. & Mayer, M. P. Structure and dynamics of the ATP- bound open conformation of Hsp70 chaperones. Mol. Cell 48, 863-874 (2012).

  7. 2kho: Bertelsen, E. B, Chang, L., Gestwicki, J. E. & Zuiderweg, E. R. P. Solution conformation of wild-type E. coli Hsp70 (DnaK) chaperone complexed with ADP and substrate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8471-8476 (2009).

  8. 2qxl: Liu, Q. & Hendrickson, W. A. Insights into Hsp70 chaperone activity from a crystal structure of the yeast Hsp110 Sse1. Cell 131, 106-120 (2007).

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health