PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Bespoke Design of Repeat Proteins
June 2015
Design and Evolution: Molecular Sleuthing Reveals Drug Selectivity
June 2015
Design and Evolution: Tunable Antibody Binders
June 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Evolution of Photoconversion
June 2015
Families in Gene Neighborhoods
June 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: A TRiC-ster that Follows the Rules
March 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: Beneficial Aggregation
March 2015
Peptidyl-carrier Proteins
October 2014
Predicting Protein Crystal Candidates
October 2014
Protein and Peptide Synthesis: Coming Full Circle
October 2014
Protein and Peptide Synthesis: Sensing Energy Balance
October 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Polysaccharide Metabolism in the Human Gut
May 2014
Design and Discovery: Evolutionary Dynamics
January 2014
Design and Discovery: Identifying New Enzymes and Metabolic Pathways
January 2014
Design and Discovery: Virtual Drug Screening
January 2014
Caught in the Act
December 2013
Microbiome: Insights into Secondary Bile Acid Synthesis
September 2013
Microbiome: Structures from Lactic Acid Bacteria
September 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Design and Discovery: A Cocktail for Proteins Without ID
February 2013
Design and Discovery: Enzyme Reprogramming
February 2013
Design and Discovery: Extreme Red Shift
February 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Designer Proteins
February 2013
Membrane Proteome: Sphingolipid Synthesis Selectivity
December 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
Serum albumin diversity
August 2012
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
Finding function for enolases
June 2012
Substrate specificity sleuths
April 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Making invisible proteins visible
October 2011
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Extremely salty
February 2010
Membrane proteins spotted in their native habitat
January 2010
How does Dali work?
December 2009
Secretagogin
December 2009
Designing activity
September 2008

Research Themes Protein design

Designing activity

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/th_psisgkb.2008.6]
Technical Highlight - September 2008
Short description: Science 319, 1387-1391 (2008)

The increasing ease in use of molecular biology techniques in recent years has contributed to the growth of the enzyme design field, where naturally occurring protein catalysts have been optimized to have improved stability and catalytic efficiency, and, for certain industrial processes, altered substrate selectivity. For the most part, enzyme design has taken the shape of directed evolution, in which large-scale random mutagenesis is coupled to selective screening for optimized catalytic activity of a given chemical reaction. While directed evolution requires no knowledge of active site structure and mechanism to be effective, the much-less successful rational design approach makes use of known structural organization of a catalytic site to purposefully tinker with features within the active site. Baker and colleagues have now developed what looks to be a huge leap forward in rational design. The authors use their approach to develop novel retro-aldol enzymes that can break a carbon-carbon bond in a non-natural substrate. They start by examining the active site of two structurally known retro-aldol enzymes. Because they were looking to design an enzyme that catalyzes a multi-step reaction, they first computationally modeled the different reaction intermediates and transition states. To improve the chances of recreating an active site that can stabilize a given transition state but also favorably interact with reaction intermediates and the other steps in the reaction pathway, the authors fine-sampled the degrees of freedom of the relevant functional groups to produce large ensembles of models for each of the key intermediate and transition states. These models were superimposed to produce several composite active site motifs capable of accommodating all reaction steps. The authors then used RosettaMatch to identify potential catalytic pockets from a library of protein scaffolds. After further optimization of the catalytic site and surrounding scaffold, the highest ranking models, based on binding energies and catalytic site geometry, were experimentally characterized. Of the 70 designs ultimately tested, 32 showed weak catalytic activity, with the most active designs having a modeled water molecule presumably involved in a proton shuffling step. The crystal structure of the best enzyme largely confirmed the modeled active site design. While this work showed that it is possible to design novel enzymatic activity, the best designs had activities that were only a fraction of those found in naturally-occurring enzymes, suggesting that additional features must be considered when optimizing the catalytic design.

Michelle Montoya

References

  1. Lin Jiang, Eric A. Althoff, Fernando R. Clemente, Lindsey Doyle, Daniela Röthlisberger et al. De Novo Computational Design of Retro-Aldol Enzymes.
    Science 319, 1387-1391 (2008). doi:10.1126/science.1152692

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health