PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons

Related Articles
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Protein Folding and Misfolding: It's the Journey, Not the Destination
March 2015
Molecular Portraits of the Cell
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: A Flexible Transporter
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Higher Resolution of Macromolecules
February 2015
Nuclear Pore Complex: Integrative Approach to Probe Nup133
February 2015
Piecing Together the Nuclear Pore Complex
February 2015
Updating ModBase
January 2015
Transmembrane Spans
December 2014
Mining Protein Dynamics
May 2014
Novel Proteins and Networks: Assigning Function
May 2014
Cancer Networks: Predicting Catalytic Residues from 3D Protein Structures
November 2013
The Immune System: A Brotherhood of Immunoglobulins
June 2013
The Immune System: Super Cytokines
June 2013
Infectious Diseases: Targeting Meningitis
May 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Protein Interaction Networks: Adding Structure to Protein Networks
April 2013
Design and Discovery: Flexible Backbone Protein Redesign
February 2013
Pocket changes
July 2012
Predictive protein origami
July 2012
Refining protein structure prediction
March 2012
Metal mates
February 2012
Devil is in the details
January 2012
Playing while you work
November 2011
Docking and rolling
October 2011
Fit to serve
October 2011
Rosetta hone
July 2011
Structure from sequence
July 2011
An easier solution for symmetry
June 2011
Solutions in the solution
June 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Guard cells pick up the SLAC
December 2010
Alpha/Beta Barrels
October 2010
Modeling RNA structures
May 2010
Deducing function from small structural clues
February 2010
Spot the pore
January 2010
Network coverage
November 2009
GPCR modeling: any good?
August 2009
Protein modeling made easy
July 2009
Model proteins in your lunch break
April 2009
Click for cancer-protein interactions
December 2008
Modeling with SAXS
October 2008
Designing activity
September 2008

Technology Topics Modeling

Modeling with SAXS

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/th_psisgkb.2008.12]
Technical Highlight - October 2008
Short description: J. Mol. Biol. 382, 1089-1106 (2008)

Steps in the refinement of a model using SAXS data. At the top are shown the various scoring functions used, and at the bottom the initial model (left) and the refined model (right) are shown.

Obtaining structural information about a protein is highly desirable but not always straightforward. X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy provide accurate high-resolution structures, but their use can be limited by protein purification difficulties or problems with crystallization or the protein's size. Single-particle electron microscopy has provided exciting insights but does not yield atomic-resolution structures. Computational protein structure prediction methods are often limited by their accuracy.

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is more versatile but provides only low-resolution information about the shape of a macromolecule or a complex in solution. It is extremely rapid, requiring only seconds to minutes to process the data. It also has the advantage that it can be used on a wide range of assemblies, from DNA fragments to whole virions.

SAXS data can aid computational modeling of proteins in two ways. One, it can be used to chose between different models, particularly for quaternary structure arrangements. And two, SAXS profiles can be used during the model-building stage.

Förster et al. have now integrated SAXS profiles into their software to produce a SAXS module within their Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP), a program for modeling proteins and their assemblies.

They used 12 simulated examples to assess their method, and then moved on to test their software against experimental data. They produced a model of the quaternary structure of the homotetramer D-xylose isomerase (XI) based on an experimental SAXS profile. It correctly determined the quaternary arrangement of the four subunits of the XI momoner from the SAXS profile and a high accuracy subunit model based on 67% sequence identity with the template structure.

Förster et al. conclude that SAXS profiles can play a useful role in modeling quaternary structure, particularly if the information is integrated with other data. Pieces of information that seem relatively uninformative by themselves can together give accurate and precise models of proteins and assemblies.

Maria Hodges


  1. Forster Friedrich, Webb Benjamin, Krukenberg Kristin A, Tsuruta Hiro, Agard David A et al. Integration of small-angle X-ray scattering data into structural modeling of proteins and their assemblies.
    J Mol Biol 382, 1089-1106 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.074

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health