PSI Structural Biology Knowledgebase

PSI | Structural Biology Knowledgebase
Header Icons
E-Collection

Related Articles
Community-Nominated Targets
July 2015
Drug Discovery: Solving the Structure of an Anti-hypertension Drug Target
July 2015
Retrospective: 7,000 Structures Closer to Understanding Biology
July 2015
Design and Evolution: Unveiling Translocator Proteins
June 2015
Signaling with DivL
May 2015
Signaling: A Platform for Opposing Functions
May 2015
Signaling: Securing Lipid-Protein Partnership
May 2015
Dynamic DnaK
March 2015
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biosynthesis
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Flipping for UCP2
December 2014
Mitochondrion: Setting a New TRAP1
December 2014
Power in Numbers
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: A Groovy New Component
August 2014
Quorum Sensing: E. coli Gets Involved
August 2014
iTRAQing the Ubiquitinome
July 2014
Microbiome: The Dynamics of Infection
September 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: A Modified SAM to Modify tRNA
July 2013
Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction: Versatile Glutamate
July 2013
PDZ Domains
April 2013
Alpha-Catenin Connections
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: A FERM Connection
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Magic Structure from Microcrystals
March 2013
Cell-Cell Interaction: Modulating Self Recognition Affinity
March 2013
Bacterial Hemophores
January 2013
Archaeal Lipids
December 2012
Membrane Proteome: Capturing Multiple Conformations
December 2012
Lethal Tendencies
October 2012
Symmetry from Asymmetry
October 2012
A signal sensing switch
September 2012
Regulatory insights
September 2012
AlkB Homologs
August 2012
Budding ensemble
August 2012
Targeting Enzyme Function with Structural Genomics
July 2012
The machines behind the spindle assembly checkpoint
June 2012
Chaperone interactions
April 2012
Pilus Assembly Protein TadZ
April 2012
Revealing the Nuclear Pore Complex
March 2012
Topping off the proteasome
March 2012
Twist to open
March 2012
Disordered Proteins
February 2012
Analyzing an allergen
January 2012
Making Lipopolysaccharide
January 2012
Pulling on loose ends
January 2012
Terminal activation
December 2011
The Perils of Protein Secretion
November 2011
Bacterial Armor
October 2011
TLR4 regulation: heads or tails?
October 2011
Ribose production on demand
September 2011
Moving some metal
August 2011
Looking for lipids
July 2011
Ribofuranosyl Binding Protein
June 2011
A molecular switch for neuronal growth
May 2011
Cell wall recycler
May 2011
Added benefits
April 2011
NMR challenges current protein hydration dogma
March 2011
Nitrile Reductase QueF
March 2011
Tip formin
March 2011
Inhibiting factor
February 2011
PASK staying active
February 2011
Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
February 2011
Regulating nitrogen assimilation
January 2011
Subtle shifts
January 2011
Nitrobindin
December 2010
Function following form
October 2010
tRNA Isopentenyltransferase MiaA
August 2010
Importance of extension for integrin
June 2010
Phytochrome
April 2010
Alg13 Subunit of N-Acetylglucosamine Transferase
February 2010
Hemolysin BL
January 2010
Secretagogin
December 2009
Two-component signaling
December 2009
Network coverage
November 2009
Pseudouridine Synthase TruA
November 2009
Unusual cell division
October 2009
Toxin-antitoxin VapBC-5
September 2009
Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2
August 2009
Proofreading RNA
July 2009
Ykul structure solves bacterial signaling puzzle
July 2009
Hda and DNA Replication
June 2009
Controlling p53
May 2009
Mitotic checkpoint control
May 2009
Ribonuclease and Ribonuclease Inhibitor
April 2009
The elusive helicase
April 2009
Aquaglyceroporin
March 2009
High-energy storage system
February 2009
A new class of bacterial E3 ubiquitination enzymes
January 2009
Poly(A) RNA recognition
January 2009
Activating BAX
December 2008
Scavenger Decapping Enzyme DcpS
November 2008
Bacteriophage Lambda cII Protein
October 2008
New metal-binding domain
October 2008
Blocking AmtB
September 2008
T-Rex
September 2008
Aspartate Dehydrogenase
August 2008
RNase T
July 2008
Chronophin
May 2008

Research Themes Cell biology

Activating BAX

PSI-SGKB [doi:10.1038/fa_psisgkb.2008.17]
Featured Article - December 2008
Short description: The structure of the pro-apoptotic protein BAX with a bound BIM BH3 'death helix' reveals that a previously unsuspected binding site on BAX triggers activation of the BAX cell-death pathway.Nature 455, 1076-1081 (2008)

Surface diagram illustrating the BAX binding site. The side chains of hydrophobic, positively charged, negatively charged and hydrophilic residues are coloured yellow, blue, red and green, respectively. (PDB 2K7W)

Stressed cells mainly die by apoptosis, and a key player in this process is the protein BAX. Until now, little molecular information existed to explain how BAX is directly activated to induce cell death, but recent structural studies, supported by biochemical and cellular work, are helping to unravel BAX's activation site and trigger mechanism.

When cells are unable to withstand stress, the 'death proteins' BAX and BAK permeabilize the mitochondrial membrane to release a cascade of molecules that induce cell death by apoptotsis. BAX and BAK are pro-apoptotic members of the BCL-2 family, which contains pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins that maintain the balance between cellular life and death through competitive interactions with each other.

BID and BIM, which are members of the BCL-2 family, have been proposed to directly activate BAX, but exactly how they do so has been the subject of much debate. BID and BIM are so-called 'BH3-only' proteins, containing sequence homologous to only one of the conserved domains (BH domains) characteristic of the BCL-2 family, unlike BAX and BAK, which are 'multi-BCL-2 homology domain proteins'. Once activated, BAX self-oligomerizes, and these oligomers disrupt mitochondrial integrity by assembling within the outer mitochondrial membrane.

To establish a detailed mechanism of direct BAX activation, Gavathiotis et al. used a structurally stabilized form of the BIM BH3 domain known as BIM SAHB (stabilized α-helices of BCL-2 domains). They had previously shown that BID SAHB could bind to BAX and directly activate BAX-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis.

Gavathiotis et al. show that BIM SAHB binds to BAX at an interaction site that is on the opposite side from the groove on BAX where anti-apoptotic proteins bind BH3 domains. They provide the first structure of a BH3 α-helix bound to a full-length pro-apoptotic multi-BCL-2 homology domain protein.

Significant changes

NMR spectroscopy showed that when BIM SAHB binds, the NMR resonances of residues from helices α1 and α6 of BAX are shifted, as are the residues in the flexible loop between helices α1 and α2, indicating that these residues are likely to form the binding site. Although the location of the BH3-binding site on BAX is different from that of anti-apoptotic proteins, the site itself is a hydrophobic groove that shares some topological features.

The NMR spectroscopy also indicated that BAX undergoes a conformational change upon binding to BIM SAHB. Gavathiotis et al. followed up this observation by establishing that BIM SAHB triggers BAX oligomerization, as monitored by size exclusion chromatography, and that it induces the exposure of BAX's N-terminal residues, detected using a conformation-specific antibody.

They confirmed the functional activation of BAX by BIM SAHB by liposomal and mitochondrial assays, and concluded that BIM SAHB directly activates BAX in a dose-responsive manner.

The authors then carried out mutagenesis of BAX to link functional activity to binding specificity, and found that point mutations at the interface impaired BIM SAHB binding and BAX activation. For example, recombinant BAX with a point mutation at lysine 21, the residue that underwent the largest resonance shift upon binding of BIM SAHB, had significantly lower levels of oligomerization than the wild-type protein.

Finally, Gavathiotis et al. examined the significance of their findings in cells. They inserted either a wild-type or the mutant BAX(K21E) construct into mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking both Bax and Bak function. On treatment with BIM SAHB or with a generic apoptotic stimulus, the wild-type BAX induced time-dependent apoptosis of BAX-reconstituted fibroblast cells, whereas BAX(K21E)-reconstituted cells had a reduced level of triggered apoptosis.

This work highlights the specificity of the interaction of BAX interaction with BIM BH3 and shows its functional relevance in vitro and in cells. The identification of a previously unknown binding site on BAX will have important implications for the development of apoptosis-based therapies for cancer and other diseases.

Maria Hodges

References

  1. Evripidis Gavathiotis, Motoshi Suzuki, Marguerite L. Davis, Kenneth Pitter, Gregory H. Bird et al. Bax activation is initiated at a novel interaction site.
    Nature 455, 1076-1081 (2008). doi:10.1038/nature07396

Structural Biology Knowledgebase ISSN: 1758-1338
Funded by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health